Bush to eat crow

Yeah, Bush is doing something, Becks...he's ensuring the his oily little buddies get paid back for their campaign donations. The illegal invasion of Iraq was based on lies and greed. The war on terrorism is as much a sham as the war on drugs that Georgie's father pretended to be fighting while funding illegal arms sales with drug money.

You claim to like the USA, Becks. Learn a little about the pig-fuckers that are destroying it and maybe you can speak up in an effort to save it. It might be to late, but it's always worth a shot.

[/quote]You claim to like the USA, Becks. Learn a little about the pig-fuckers that are destroying it and maybe you can speak up in an effort to save it. It might be to late, but it's always worth a shot.[/quote]

Correction, I love the USA. No, the pigtrucker are all in canada. There are far worse things in canada going down that are destroying our country. A matter of time before we become one with the USA. It won't be long, but rest assured, it will happen.

Spelling mistakes are the least of my worries.

I also love canada. So to be called a 'traitorous' for proclaiming to also love and respect the us is very self serving on your part. You must have been raised in Ontario. My guess would be very close to TO. I think you delve too far into what people actually say that what is actually being said. Perhaps take a step back and look at the whole picture instead of trying to analyse each sentence.

[quote="Beckie"
I also love canada. So to be called a 'traitorous' for proclaiming to also love and respect the us is very self serving on your part.

I still think you'd be happier down here so let's switch places.

If the bush administration wants to show the media weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, I have a feeling they will have to put the 'evidence' there themselves.

-Robair
Blix calls Iraq weapons allegations 'spin'

CTV.ca News Staff

Former United Nations chief weapons inspector Hans Blix is criticizing U.S. and British allegations that Iraq possessed so-called weapons of mass destruction as "spin" and "hype" that was simply an attempt to justify an invasion.

Blix likened the weapons allegations to a witch hunt, saying the U.S. and Britain convinced themselves Iraq had nuclear, chemical or biological weapons based on flimsy evidence.

"In the Middle Ages when people were convinced there were witches they certainly found them. This is a bit risky," Blix told BBC radio.

He said a controversial British dossier outlining Iraq's alleged weapons led readers to misguided conclusions.

"What in a way stands accused is the culture of spin, the culture of hyping ... Advertisers will advertise a refrigerator in terms that we don't quite believe in, but we expect governments to be more serious and have more credibility," Blix said.

U.S. President George Bush said Iraq's alleged weapons program was an immediate threat in the lead-up to the war that ousted former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein.

In Britain, Prime Minister Tony Blair also touted the alleged weapons program as the reason his government supported the U.S.-led invasion.

Both leaders still maintain evidence of banned weapons will be found in Iraq, but that the search will not bear fruit overnight.

A search by scientists and intelligence experts has failed to uncover any weapons so far.

"The patience that they require for themselves now was not anything that they wanted to give to us," Blix told the BBC.

Blix led the weapons search in Iraq ahead of the May invasion, but he and his team were forced to leave following just 15 weeks of work.

Blix admitted they did uncover "minor things," but characterized them as "debris from the past" that did not suggest a weapons program of any significance.

Demetrius Perricos, Blix's successor, has made similar comments. He has told Reuters it was becoming "more and more difficult to believe stocks (of weapons) were" in Iraq.

Blix's time is up. He going to write a book, and how else to boost your book sales (?), by stirring the friggin pot! Come on, why did it take him six months to come forward with these blurbs? Was it perhaps he was as unsure the US would find something, like everyone else?

Do you recall the defector (whose name leaves me) who, after the UN declared Iraq as being free of nucleur capabilities, stunned the UN by providing information that they not only had nucleur facilities, but indeed were perhaps a year away from 'the bomb'?

For me Robair, just the mass graves containing upwards of a couple hundred thousand human beings, simply justifies everything. That alone, doesn't that raise a question?