Capitolism sucks. Seriously.
BeaverBill BeaverBill:
Socialist health care.
Although, it has its pitfalls, it is much better than the capitalist system. Problem is that the capitalist gov't has no responsibility to its citizens other than patting you on the back while sporting a shit eating grin. Large national & multinational corporations can feed you all the shit in the world, since they practically run the gov't, and when you get sick you have to pay for it!!! Your a science experiment, don't even know it, and smile the whole way through.
While in theory the socialist method of health care needs a bit more care (not always the case but most of the time.) in its practices since your health can undermine the budget.
Capitalist system deals with ADVANCE and CAPITAL. Feed everyone shit (since its good for production eg growth hormones in beef cattle), everyone comes up with the same symptoms, noooones got a problem! It's normal. (obeisity for example). Then sell the pill to cure those people that can be cured (the rest just fade away and are used for autopsies)and the cycle gets repeated. It's good for buisness and creates jobs!! Not only that, sometimes you don't even buy the pill that is best for you nor need a pill at all, but since all the doctor gets percentages for pill pushing you get it anyway and he gets a free holiday golfing!! Isn't that GREAT!! There's looking after you !!!?
I prefer quality of life under socialism.
You can keep it Comrade!
Canadian_Mind Canadian_Mind:
What I dislike about capitoilism is that the rich, lazy folks get richer, and the poor, hard working folks get poorer. And then in america they shaft the poor folk by raising taxes on them, while they lower taxes for the rich! At least in canada its the middle class getting the shaft. Seriously, there are sooooo many loopholes for the rich to get out of paying taxes, I'd never be able to list them all.
I think the best way to go everywhere is to get rid of taxes for people making 30 000 or less. then have the same tax deductions as it is now for the rest of the work force, accept for 35 000 -45 000, take it down a few more percentage points. And no one can ever get more than 100 000 a year. If you make 200 000 a year, 100 000 will go to taxes, the rest will be yours. If you make a million or more, chances are that you work behind a desk all day and don't deserve the money, so you to will only get 100 000 q year and the other 900 000 will go to the government. way more money to spend on things like medi-care, education, and military. Might even be able to get rid of GST and PST. Also get rid of the insurance companies. You should be able to get insurance as a tax return if you get into a car accident, or get severly injured. Because I don't feeel like spending 20 000 on a vehicle, then spnding another 250 bucks a month on insurance aswell as car payments.
Also, make the tax cuts even larger for families with 3 children or more, but don't encourage population growth. With this sort of system our economies would survive even if the baby boomers begin to retire.
Current-day monetary structures are not zero-sum. When the currencies were on gold and silver standards it was true that if someone got rich someone else had to get poor. But not anymore. In the USA another $100 million or so is added to the economy every day by the Federal Reserve and Canada does the same thing on a proportionately similar scale.
But to say capitalism sucks? Not at all. Capitalism allows YOU to work hard and innovate and profit freely from your innovation. You reap what you sow,
So-called 'progressive' tax rates mean that rich people ideally should be subsidizing poor people, but they get their loopholes and most of them pay less in taxes than those in the bottom 10% of income earners.
A flat tax where everyone pays the same percentage of income with no loopholes and no deductions would have rich people paying more than they pay today and poor people would pay less except for the very poor who would now be contributing to the systems they depend on. As well they should.
PeterFinn PeterFinn:
Canadian_Mind Canadian_Mind:
What I dislike about capitoilism is that the rich, lazy folks get richer, and the poor, hard working folks get poorer. And then in america they shaft the poor folk by raising taxes on them, while they lower taxes for the rich! At least in canada its the middle class getting the shaft. Seriously, there are sooooo many loopholes for the rich to get out of paying taxes, I'd never be able to list them all.
I think the best way to go everywhere is to get rid of taxes for people making 30 000 or less. then have the same tax deductions as it is now for the rest of the work force, accept for 35 000 -45 000, take it down a few more percentage points. And no one can ever get more than 100 000 a year. If you make 200 000 a year, 100 000 will go to taxes, the rest will be yours. If you make a million or more, chances are that you work behind a desk all day and don't deserve the money, so you to will only get 100 000 q year and the other 900 000 will go to the government. way more money to spend on things like medi-care, education, and military. Might even be able to get rid of GST and PST. Also get rid of the insurance companies. You should be able to get insurance as a tax return if you get into a car accident, or get severly injured. Because I don't feeel like spending 20 000 on a vehicle, then spnding another 250 bucks a month on insurance aswell as car payments.
Also, make the tax cuts even larger for families with 3 children or more, but don't encourage population growth. With this sort of system our economies would survive even if the baby boomers begin to retire.
Current-day monetary structures are not zero-sum. When the currencies were on gold and silver standards it was true that if someone got rich someone else had to get poor. But not anymore. In the USA another $100 million or so is added to the economy every day by the Federal Reserve and Canada does the same thing on a proportionately similar scale.
But to say capitalism sucks? Not at all. Capitalism allows YOU to work hard and innovate and profit freely from your innovation. You reap what you sow,
So-called 'progressive' tax rates mean that rich people ideally should be subsidizing poor people, but they get their loopholes and most of them pay less in taxes than those in the bottom 10% of income earners.
A flat tax where everyone pays the same percentage of income with no loopholes and no deductions would have rich people paying more than they pay today and poor people would pay less except for the very poor who would now be contributing to the systems they depend on. As well they should.
killing the loop holes is neccisary, if nothing else. Even with a flat tax the uber-rich still have billlions to bribe the government with.
Then let's take the argument to the end game.
A maximum wage law.
Since the fact that people can be "rich" pisses off Communists then implement a maximum wage law and a maximum assets law.
Make it illegal to earn anymore than a certain amount in any given year.
Make it so that anyone who has over a certain value in assets has those assets seized by the government.
Then there'll be no "rich" people to piss you off because everyone will be poor.
PeterFinn PeterFinn:
Then let's take the argument to the end game.
A maximum wage law.
Since the fact that people can be "rich" pisses off Communists then implement a maximum wage law and a maximum assets law.
Make it illegal to earn anymore than a certain amount in any given year.
Make it so that anyone who has over a certain value in assets has those assets seized by the government.
Then there'll be no "rich" people to piss you off because everyone will be poor.
Yup thats called communism.
Ali-G @ Fri Apr 29, 2005 2:45 pm
Since we don't have Socialism, how can you know if you prefer it? We have capitalism with social programs, paid for by working people who would mostly rather be spending their money in other ways. Cambodia under Pol Pot had Socialism, Russia under Josef Stalin, Albania under Enver Hoxha, China under Mao, all had Socialism. Want to live like that?
I came here hoping to find some useful dialogue, but I am seeing the usual boring mental midgets with a headful of garbage, propaganda sponges with no ability to think for themselves. A bunch of yapping parrots who repeat what their masters have taught them. Conspiracy theory, knee-jerk anti-Americanism, all the things that make me embarrassed to be a Canadian. This used to be a great country, or at least a damn good one, until a huge chunk of the population was afflicted by an epidemic of whatever it is that turns people into chickenshit whiners and bloodsuckers.
Thinking is a dying art that requires practice, and I have no hope most of the people here - or anywhere - will ever learn it. Being jerked around by the media, both mainstream and underground, over trivialities that will be fogotten in ten years, is no way to live. There is so much more you could be doing with your one life, your one mind, and you are pissing it all away! We were born here to learn, not to repeat back whatever we're told by strangers!
This is what a half-assed conveyor-belt education system has taught us to do, and it's pitiful. More grist for the nine-to-five mills, more ditch-diggers and welfare drunks. This country doesn't kick ass, it is the laughingstock of the G-8, who only let us in becaue we're so close to the Yankees. Anyway the whole idea of having to constantly explain the few tiny differences between us and the Yanks only makes us all the more pitiful; hating the Americans means hating yourself - and the only cure for that is therapy.
pfft,
Ali.
Ali-G @ Fri Apr 29, 2005 2:48 pm
Actually I take some of what I just wrote back - I'm seeing people justifiably knocking down the Commie crap getting posted here, and I applaud you.
Ali.
Ali-G @ Fri Apr 29, 2005 2:52 pm
Last for today: if you're going to try to tear down capitalism, at least learn to spell it. Why is anyone here taking you seriously at all, Canadian Mind? Nobody in my family has ever made anything like $80K, you are living off the fat of the land, so kindly STFU you great bloody hypocrite!
Ali
There's alot of socialism in Europe.
Russia preached more communism....? (more to the left of socialism) or am I wrong. Russia also had exterior forces which took them down, and for such a vast country communism did them OK, by no rationale was it freedom. Was it necessary to in order to bridge gaps in their society (How many time zones?)? Now that they have been dismantled and running under the guise of "democracy" how has that helped them? Are they much better now with the mafia running amuck?
Cuba. Another communist state. China.... communist (left of middle) and.... 1 billion strong+. What sort of system should China have to manage so many?
I am of opinion that socialism is more towards center than you think but for arguement's sake we'll say middle left and capitalism is middle right. .
England..socialism. Free healthcare, social benefits, social programs, commerce, military, social support in education. Is it really that bad having a social conscious or should it be dog eat dog? Is the top of the pyramid, the untouchables & the elitist, just in communism and non capitalistic gov'ts? You and I might never see the exclusivity of those affairs, in communism or in capitalism or dictatorships, etc..(eg George Bush has a frikin dog better treated than some Americans.) There obvious differences but also striking similarities. They're human and corruption is always accessable for the higher ranks without reprisal. I don't agree with your posts.
What's the deal with all the right-wing people using the same old thing: Blah blah blah COMRADE.
Come on people! Originality and uniqueness!!!! Not all socialists can be painted as "Comrades". This is totally reminding me of the old whenever the left makes a point or a news submission, the right responds with: "This is biased left-wing liberal media bullshit."
I wanna see some originality here or else I'll have REALLY lost faith in you right-wing people.
Originality=spice of life!!!!!!!!!

PeterFinn PeterFinn:
Then let's take the argument to the end game.
A maximum wage law.
Since the fact that people can be "rich" pisses off Communists then implement a maximum wage law and a maximum assets law.
Make it illegal to earn anymore than a certain amount in any given year.
Make it so that anyone who has over a certain value in assets has those assets seized by the government.
Then there'll be no "rich" people to piss you off because everyone will be poor.
whats your definition of poor? $100 000 a year is a large lump of cash, even in canadian dollars. and with the government paying for nearly everything, even folks that make 35 000 a year can live richly.
Canadian_Mind Canadian_Mind:
PeterFinn PeterFinn:
Then let's take the argument to the end game.
A maximum wage law.
Since the fact that people can be "rich" pisses off Communists then implement a maximum wage law and a maximum assets law.
Make it illegal to earn anymore than a certain amount in any given year.
Make it so that anyone who has over a certain value in assets has those assets seized by the government.
Then there'll be no "rich" people to piss you off because everyone will be poor.
whats your definition of poor? $100 000 a year is a large lump of cash, even in canadian dollars. and with the government paying for nearly everything, even folks that make 35 000 a year can live richly.
Ah, a fish took the bait.
So the government implements the Maximum Wage Law at $25,000.00 a year since $35,000.00 is "rich" to someone who earns only $25,000.00. But then $25,000.00 is "rich" to the Newfie who only makes $5,000.00 beating the hell out of baby seals so in the interest of egalitarianism (amazed you with the big word, didn't I?) the government makes the Maximum Wage $5,000 since any more than that is unfair to loser Newfies.
This is Communism, Comrade.
Have fun with it.
PeterFinn PeterFinn:
Canadian_Mind Canadian_Mind:
PeterFinn PeterFinn:
Then let's take the argument to the end game.
A maximum wage law.
Since the fact that people can be "rich" pisses off Communists then implement a maximum wage law and a maximum assets law.
Make it illegal to earn anymore than a certain amount in any given year.
Make it so that anyone who has over a certain value in assets has those assets seized by the government.
Then there'll be no "rich" people to piss you off because everyone will be poor.
whats your definition of poor? $100 000 a year is a large lump of cash, even in canadian dollars. and with the government paying for nearly everything, even folks that make 35 000 a year can live richly.
Ah, a fish took the bait.
So the government implements the Maximum Wage Law at $25,000.00 a year since $35,000.00 is "rich" to someone who earns only $25,000.00. But then $25,000.00 is "rich" to the Newfie who only makes $5,000.00 beating the hell out of baby seals so in the interest of egalitarianism (amazed you with the big word, didn't I?) the government makes the Maximum Wage $5,000 since any more than that is unfair to loser Newfies.
This is Communism, Comrade.
Have fun with it.
ha ha ha ha, are you blind? I said the tax would be imposed for anyone over 100 000 so it would end up that people making over 100 000 would only get 100 000 of it. Like i said earlier, a person who makes a million would only make 100 000, so they would pay 900 000 to the government. Some might call that unfair, so say they get a base of 100 000, plus 10-20% of what they earn. so that millionar would get 100 000 of their million, plus another 100 000 to 200 000 because thats 10% 20% of a million.
And the newfies who kill seals? I don't care! Aslong as they use most of the seal, like the inuit, I'm fine with it. I'm against poaching them for single body parts however.
Why limit what people can earn and achieve? I always am amazed at the envy of the "rich" as no one has ever been employed by a poor guy.
Stop worrying about what someone else earns and pay more attention to your own business and either be content with what you have or strive to earn more.
I used to work for US$9.00 per hour and yesterday (after a lot of hard work and years of college and effort) the job I now have gave me a US$20,000 per year raise.
I've never begrudged a 'rich' person the money they earned or even inherited. I paid more attention to my place in the world and I've worked my ass off to improve that place and it is paying off.
And come September I'll be staying at the Empress in Victoria instead of the Strathcona and making Canada a little richer before I leave.
Envy is a sin and there is good reason for that. Communism is envy run amok and 100 million people died because of it.
Become a millionaire and I'll toast your success. 
PeterFinn PeterFinn:
Why limit what people can earn and achieve? I always am amazed at the envy of the "rich" as no one has ever been employed by a poor guy.
Stop worrying about what someone else earns and pay more attention to your own business and either be content with what you have or strive to earn more.
I used to work for US$9.00 per hour and yesterday (after a lot of hard work and years of college and effort) the job I now have gave me a US$20,000 per year raise.
I've never begrudged a 'rich' person the money they earned or even inherited. I paid more attention to my place in the world and I've worked my ass off to improve that place and it is paying off.
And come September I'll be staying at the Empress in Victoria instead of the Strathcona and making Canada a little richer before I leave.
Envy is a sin and there is good reason for that. Communism is envy run amok and 100 million people died because of it.
Become a millionaire and I'll toast your success.

Ah, I love it.

Good post, Peter.