Previous  1 ... 3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

I'm still waiting to hear why you think "carpet bombing" actually happened.



I am not predisposed into believing that my government is wrong every time some leftist says that my government is.



We, the majority of people who reelected the president, say we approve of his policy concerning Iraq and summarily dismiss the leftist view that bombs don't kill terrorist.



What you posted is propaganda. What you haven't done is sufficiently prooved your assertion with reliable sources. Your so-called proof is suspect, anti-America, wrong, and extreme leftist.

   

What he posted was a scientific survey. If you are going to say that it is wrong, then you have to prove that using science.

   

So why did Dubya declare war on Iraq if not for oil? What is the policy you approve of?

   

It was to get rid of the old people.

   

His policy in defending the US. In other words, his job.

   

But Iraq was no threat to the USA.

   

Threat....Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm...


What that means?

   

Iraq was no threat to anybody.

I always was 100% for the invasion of Afghanistan. There was deafinatly a threat living there.

But you're going to have to come up with some proof, Roc, that Iraq had anything to do with protecting America.

Those are two seperate countries and two seperate wars.

   

Saddam was in violation of 17 UN resolutions. Not to mention he constantly fired on US and UK aircraft. We could not afford to allow him to continue. He tortured his own people, raped an entire nation, killed hundreds of thousands of his own people, and buried them in mass graves, one of them found today, he was a criminal the left was willing to allow to go free.

We are better off with him in prison. No thanks to the left.

   

That still doesn't justify invasion. The fact that GWB went to the UN and pressured for a new resolution mandating the use of force bears this out. And believe it or not Roc, everyone on the left believes Saddam was a piece of shit. But ask youself this: which version of Iraq do you prefer? The old one where Saddam was in power but contained and controlled or the current one where there is no government and only chaos? Ask any Iraqi and they'll say the former. Why? Because stability with the possibility of violence is preferable to most people as opposed to indiscriminate violence.

   

The US is in violation of several UN resolutions, international laws, and even it's own military and civilian laws. By your standards that means that you deserve to be invaded, Roc.

   

I could have sworn the reasons given to go to war were WMD and terrorist links... one of us must have a foggy memory, Roc.

Firing on US and UK planes? NO SHIT. They were flying in Iraqi airspace and dropping bombs on Iraqi soil. Bet you thought the no-fly-zone was a universal thing. Not so. It was a US/British initiative never backed by the UN.

'Afford' to allow him to continue? You mean money-wise? What's the bill on Duybas little adventure so far?

There are dictators that make Saddam look like a kitten. Didn't those graves happen while America was his buddy? Like over a decade ago?

Nowhere in your post is there a mention of a threat to America, and I believe you stated Dubya's policy for the Iraq invasion was to protect America. What gives, changing your story?

What is Dubyas policy that you support?? The vast majority of people outside America can not figure out why you voted for him. Help us out here.

Plenty of conservatives have been against the Iraq war from day one (the thinking ones anyway) so you can quit throwing the 'left' label around at any time.

   

So, am I to believe you support the rape and torture of millions? You would allow Saddam to continue to bury his people in mass graves?

Tsk tsk, and you call yourself a good leftist.

   

Nope, don't support that at all. In fact it's one of the reasons why I'm against George Bush.

   

Guess my questions are too tough.

   

Previous  1 ... 3  4  5  6  7  8  Next