RUEZ for Moderator.
RUEZ @ Mon Feb 19, 2007 9:14 am
IceOwl IceOwl:
Having a level head usually involves not throwing tantrums when people criticize your poor behaviour, and not being a bigot toward people because of their religion. I vote no.
Coming from you that's a compliment, you are just pissed because your nazi days on the CKA chat room are over. It seems you are the one that threw the tantrum, and if you have any links to me being a bigot then post them. Otherwise STFU. You are one reason I wouldn't be a mod, just so I could keep telling you to kiss my ass hippy.
grainfedprairieboy @ Mon Feb 19, 2007 10:14 am
RUEZ RUEZ:
IceOwl IceOwl:
Having a level head usually involves not throwing tantrums when people criticize your poor behaviour, and not being a bigot toward people because of their religion. I vote no.
Coming from you that's a compliment, you are just pissed because your nazi days on the CKA chat room are over. It seems you are the one that threw the tantrum, and if you have any links to me being a bigot then post them. Otherwise STFU. You are one reason I wouldn't be a mod, just so I could keep telling you to kiss my ass hippy.And that is why most people here believe you would make an excellent moderator, you can distinguish between telling some flake to piss off because you personally find them obtuse and using your authority for personal vindictive purposes. Those of us on all sides politically who have visited other boards know exactly what I speak off.
RUEZ @ Mon Feb 19, 2007 10:28 am
IceOwl IceOwl:
RUEZ RUEZ:
IceOwl IceOwl:
Having a level head usually involves not throwing tantrums when people criticize your poor behaviour, and not being a bigot toward people because of their religion. I vote no.
Coming from you that's a compliment, you are just pissed because your nazi days on the CKA chat room are over. Pissed? Over? I left because I got bored.
$1:
It seems you are the one that threw the tantrum, and if you have any links to me being a bigot then post them. Otherwise STFU. You are one reason I wouldn't be a mod, just so I could keep telling you to kiss my ass hippy.
I suppose this is your idea of being level-headed?
Just the fact that so many bigots are giving you the thumbs up should give the mods a huge warning sign that including you in their ranks would be a bad idea.
grainfedprairieboy @ Mon Feb 19, 2007 10:35 am
IceOwl IceOwl:
Just the fact that so many bigots are giving you the thumbs up should give the mods a huge warning sign that including you in their ranks would be a bad idea.
I suggest we wait for the outcome of the poll. I feel that RUEZ is one of the few who has solid support from across the political spectrum and I believe the comments here reflect that.
You may have a problem with RUEZ but knowing you, I'd blame you rather then RUEZ as you pretty much have a problem with everyone.
Tricks @ Mon Feb 19, 2007 10:40 am
It's interesting that IceOwl calls everyone who supports RUEZ a bigot. Definition of bigot is...
a person who is utterly intolerant of any differing creed, belief, or opinion.
Ironic no?
RUEZ @ Mon Feb 19, 2007 10:55 am
IceOwl IceOwl:
Tricks Tricks:
It's interesting that IceOwl calls everyone who supports RUEZ a bigot. Definition of bigot is...
a person who is utterly intolerant of any differing creed, belief, or opinion.
Ironic no?
a person who is utterly intolerant of any differing creed, belief, or opinion.
Ironic no?
No, since I didn't call everyone who supports RUEZ a bigot.
Tricks @ Mon Feb 19, 2007 10:58 am
IceOwl IceOwl:
Tricks Tricks:
It's interesting that IceOwl calls everyone who supports RUEZ a bigot. Definition of bigot is...
a person who is utterly intolerant of any differing creed, belief, or opinion.
Ironic no?
a person who is utterly intolerant of any differing creed, belief, or opinion.
Ironic no?
No, since I didn't call everyone who supports RUEZ a bigot.
$1:
Just the fact that so many bigots are giving you the thumbs up
So who are you referring to? People on the opposite side of the spectrum to you?
fire_i @ Mon Feb 19, 2007 7:44 pm
While he doesn't seem interested in the position, Yes to RUEZ is my vote here. It's symbolic more than anything, but that doesn't hurt. 
xerxes @ Mon Feb 19, 2007 7:49 pm
While I most certainly would welcome Ruez as a moderator, I'm still of the opinion that this is the sort of thing should not be voted on. I feel the same way for the election of judges.
ShepherdsDog @ Mon Feb 19, 2007 7:50 pm
Well anything that IceOwl is against has to be good for everyone else, so he gets my nod.
RUEZ @ Mon Feb 19, 2007 7:51 pm
fire_i fire_i:
While he doesn't seem interested in the position, Yes to RUEZ is my vote here. It's symbolic more than anything, but that doesn't hurt.
It's not that I'm not interested, I'd certainly give it some thought if offered. I do however like to mix it up at times especially in the political discussions, and I don't always get along with everyone. I wouldn't want it if I had to keep my opinions to myself, that's all I'm saying. But it's not whether I get it or not, it's just an honour to be nominated. 
Scrappy @ Mon Feb 19, 2007 7:53 pm
ShepherdsDog ShepherdsDog:
Well anything that IceOwl is against has to be good for everyone else, so he gets my nod.
Me to, but I like Ruez but then again what ever IceOwl is against I'd vote for just out of spite. God forgive me for my sins. I'm a bitch and evil or so I'm told.
ShepherdsDog @ Mon Feb 19, 2007 7:54 pm
xerxes xerxes:
While I most certainly would welcome Ruez as a moderator, I'm still of the opinion that this is the sort of thing should not be voted on. I feel the same way for the election of judges.
I don't know. How about the government nominates a few choices and we get to vote for the one we want.