Catholic schools and ethics?
Previous 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Tricks @ Mon May 14, 2007 8:38 pm
lily lily:
It just goes to show how far you had to reach to make whatever point you thought you had to make.
Well actually I knew where to look...took me about 5 minutes.
GerryHurt @ Mon May 14, 2007 8:38 pm
PluggyRug PluggyRug:
$1:
Ya know....I really don't think the lot of ya have half a brain between ya's.
How would someone who fits the description know that?
$1:
Ya's don't like "MY" opinion of his hatred.....tough shit!
Ok.. but you must see the reverse hatred in your opinion.
$1:
As for Tricks........ he keeps me smilin
That show of condescension displays the 'adult ism' attitude
reverse hatred?????I don't "hate him", I just think he's a complete moron for carrying it around with him for so long.
Ya know......I really don't care how old someone is....male....female...young...old....... if your an idiot, age or sex has very little to do with it. As Lily pointed out, I'm an equal opportunity asshole.
GerryHurt @ Mon May 14, 2007 8:45 pm
WDHIII WDHIII:
GerryHurt GerryHurt:
Tricks Tricks:
GerryHurt GerryHurt:
As for Tricks........ he keeps me smilin.
8O Why do I suddenly not want to bend over? Zing! 
I don't know....cause your boyfriend is sleeping over?
Im sorry youre in your 40s?
Youre giving Tricks a hard time about his age and you reply with 8th grade humor?
Pathetic....
Really? gotta keep down to his mental level.
canucker @ Mon May 14, 2007 8:46 pm
Tricks Tricks:
lily lily:
You know... it occurs to me that you and MrC make more of your age than anyone else here.
People rarely "lose" debates on this forum.
And you want proof? Fine, I will go through Gerry's posts.I was referring to this statement made earlier in another thread:
canucker canucker:
Mr_Canada Mr_Canada:
Oh, and adultism is a widely used tool in debates nowadays.
Where? I've never seen it before. And even if it is, it's a big stretch to use it in these forums. There is a difference in discriminating against someone for posting juvenile or immature posts, as opposed to specifically discriminating against a persons age, even if they have valid points. IMO, it's the most childish excuse in the book, especially in these forums.
It's not the age of the poster that has come into question, it was the nature of the posts. He only brought up the age issue after realizing the cause of the immature views...
So where and when is this "widely used tool" used?
GerryHurt @ Mon May 14, 2007 8:50 pm
WDHIII WDHIII:
GerryHurt GerryHurt:
WDHIII WDHIII:
GerryHurt GerryHurt:
Tricks Tricks:
GerryHurt GerryHurt:
As for Tricks........ he keeps me smilin.
8O Why do I suddenly not want to bend over? Zing! I don't know....cause your boyfriend is sleeping over?
Im sorry youre in your 40s?
Youre giving Tricks a hard time about his age and you reply with 8th grade humor?
Pathetic....
Really? gotta keep down to his mental level.
Oh ANOTHER good one from the supposed "adult" of this conversation.....
ROFLMFAO....... Christ...ya gotta stop......
Tricks @ Mon May 14, 2007 8:53 pm
canucker canucker:
Tricks Tricks:
lily lily:
You know... it occurs to me that you and MrC make more of your age than anyone else here.
People rarely "lose" debates on this forum.
And you want proof? Fine, I will go through Gerry's posts.I was referring to this statement made earlier in another thread:
canucker canucker:
Mr_Canada Mr_Canada:
Oh, and adultism is a widely used tool in debates nowadays.
Where? I've never seen it before. And even if it is, it's a big stretch to use it in these forums. There is a difference in discriminating against someone for posting juvenile or immature posts, as opposed to specifically discriminating against a persons age, even if they have valid points. IMO, it's the most childish excuse in the book, especially in these forums.
It's not the age of the poster that has come into question, it was the nature of the posts. He only brought up the age issue after realizing the cause of the immature views...
So where and when is this "widely used tool" used?
Tricks @ Mon May 14, 2007 8:54 pm
lily lily:
WDHIII...
Why no comment on what Tricks said?
At the risk of sounding childish - he started it.
So far, I haven't seen you contribute a thing to this thread. All you've done is drop by with insulting little comments in support of Tricks.
Pst....I was kidding around. Trying to lighten to mood a little. Hence the "zing" and ":lol:"
Why no comment on what Tricks said?
$1:
Why do I suddenly not want to bend over? Zing!
At the risk of sounding childish - he started it.
So far, I haven't seen you contribute a thing to this thread. All you've done is drop by with insulting little comments in support of Tricks.
I will put in little print just kidding next time ok?
canucker @ Mon May 14, 2007 8:58 pm
Tricks Tricks:
canucker canucker:
Tricks Tricks:
lily lily:
You know... it occurs to me that you and MrC make more of your age than anyone else here.
People rarely "lose" debates on this forum.
And you want proof? Fine, I will go through Gerry's posts.I was referring to this statement made earlier in another thread:
canucker canucker:
Mr_Canada Mr_Canada:
Oh, and adultism is a widely used tool in debates nowadays.
Where? I've never seen it before. And even if it is, it's a big stretch to use it in these forums. There is a difference in discriminating against someone for posting juvenile or immature posts, as opposed to specifically discriminating against a persons age, even if they have valid points. IMO, it's the most childish excuse in the book, especially in these forums.
It's not the age of the poster that has come into question, it was the nature of the posts. He only brought up the age issue after realizing the cause of the immature views...
So where and when is this "widely used tool" used?
I've seen those posts, and I've already addressed them....
Anyways, unless someone can give me a legitimate use of the term "Adultism", I'm done with this so called "debate".
Tricks @ Mon May 14, 2007 9:01 pm
canucker canucker:
Tricks Tricks:
canucker canucker:
Tricks Tricks:
lily lily:
You know... it occurs to me that you and MrC make more of your age than anyone else here.
People rarely "lose" debates on this forum.
And you want proof? Fine, I will go through Gerry's posts.I was referring to this statement made earlier in another thread:
canucker canucker:
Mr_Canada Mr_Canada:
Oh, and adultism is a widely used tool in debates nowadays.
Where? I've never seen it before. And even if it is, it's a big stretch to use it in these forums. There is a difference in discriminating against someone for posting juvenile or immature posts, as opposed to specifically discriminating against a persons age, even if they have valid points. IMO, it's the most childish excuse in the book, especially in these forums.
It's not the age of the poster that has come into question, it was the nature of the posts. He only brought up the age issue after realizing the cause of the immature views...
So where and when is this "widely used tool" used?
I've seen those posts, and I've already addressed them....
Anyways, unless someone can give me a legitimate use of the term "Adultism", I'm done with this so called "debate".
GerryHurt @ Mon May 14, 2007 9:03 pm
WDHIII WDHIII:
canucker canucker:
Tricks Tricks:
canucker canucker:
Tricks Tricks:
lily lily:
You know... it occurs to me that you and MrC make more of your age than anyone else here.
People rarely "lose" debates on this forum.
And you want proof? Fine, I will go through Gerry's posts.I was referring to this statement made earlier in another thread:
canucker canucker:
Mr_Canada Mr_Canada:
Oh, and adultism is a widely used tool in debates nowadays.
Where? I've never seen it before. And even if it is, it's a big stretch to use it in these forums. There is a difference in discriminating against someone for posting juvenile or immature posts, as opposed to specifically discriminating against a persons age, even if they have valid points. IMO, it's the most childish excuse in the book, especially in these forums.
It's not the age of the poster that has come into question, it was the nature of the posts. He only brought up the age issue after realizing the cause of the immature views...
So where and when is this "widely used tool" used?
I've seen those posts, and I've already addressed them....
Anyways, unless someone can give me a legitimate use of the term "Adultism", I'm done with this so called "debate".
yes dismiss the "child"
It should be "seen and not heard"........ but that's not possible with morons like you allowing the little ones to run rampant.
canucker @ Mon May 14, 2007 9:04 pm
WDHIII WDHIII:
canucker canucker:
Tricks Tricks:
canucker canucker:
Tricks Tricks:
lily lily:
You know... it occurs to me that you and MrC make more of your age than anyone else here.
People rarely "lose" debates on this forum.
And you want proof? Fine, I will go through Gerry's posts.I was referring to this statement made earlier in another thread:
canucker canucker:
Mr_Canada Mr_Canada:
Oh, and adultism is a widely used tool in debates nowadays.
Where? I've never seen it before. And even if it is, it's a big stretch to use it in these forums. There is a difference in discriminating against someone for posting juvenile or immature posts, as opposed to specifically discriminating against a persons age, even if they have valid points. IMO, it's the most childish excuse in the book, especially in these forums.
It's not the age of the poster that has come into question, it was the nature of the posts. He only brought up the age issue after realizing the cause of the immature views...
So where and when is this "widely used tool" used?
I've seen those posts, and I've already addressed them....
Anyways, unless someone can give me a legitimate use of the term "Adultism", I'm done with this so called "debate".
yes dismiss the "child"
Like lily mentioned, nice contribution...
GerryHurt @ Mon May 14, 2007 9:07 pm
Tricks Tricks:
Uh....What? Legitimate use of the term Adultism? You mean a legitimate example? I think I just gave you some...
See....that's your problem..... you really should stop trying to do that.....you aren't very good at it.
Tricks @ Mon May 14, 2007 9:08 pm
GerryHurt GerryHurt:
WDHIII WDHIII:
canucker canucker:
Tricks Tricks:
canucker canucker:
Tricks Tricks:
lily lily:
You know... it occurs to me that you and MrC make more of your age than anyone else here.
People rarely "lose" debates on this forum.
And you want proof? Fine, I will go through Gerry's posts.I was referring to this statement made earlier in another thread:
canucker canucker:
Mr_Canada Mr_Canada:
Oh, and adultism is a widely used tool in debates nowadays.
Where? I've never seen it before. And even if it is, it's a big stretch to use it in these forums. There is a difference in discriminating against someone for posting juvenile or immature posts, as opposed to specifically discriminating against a persons age, even if they have valid points. IMO, it's the most childish excuse in the book, especially in these forums.
It's not the age of the poster that has come into question, it was the nature of the posts. He only brought up the age issue after realizing the cause of the immature views...
So where and when is this "widely used tool" used?
I've seen those posts, and I've already addressed them....
Anyways, unless someone can give me a legitimate use of the term "Adultism", I'm done with this so called "debate".
yes dismiss the "child"
It should be "seen and not heard"........ but that's not possible with morons like you allowing the little ones to run rampant.
Tricks @ Mon May 14, 2007 9:10 pm
GerryHurt GerryHurt:
Tricks Tricks:
Uh....What? Legitimate use of the term Adultism? You mean a legitimate example? I think I just gave you some...
See....that's your problem..... you really should stop trying to do that.....you aren't very god at it.
canucker @ Mon May 14, 2007 9:10 pm
Tricks Tricks:
Good enough Canucker?
Either you didn't read my post, or you just don't understand. Nevermind....
Previous 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next