Context: two days ago we revealed that Peterson botched an attempt at redaction and publicly exposed the names and home addresses of people who complained about him to the Ontario College of Psychologists.
Yesterday I noted that this opinion piece in defence of Peterson was actually written by Peterson's own lawyer, who failed to disclose the relationship.
Not unexpected from a lawyer.
I knew Saager would have a shit take on this. This is yellow journalism because at no point has Peterson disclosed what the college has a bone of contention with as that is between JP and the college NOT public discourse. This is just spin and disinfo. Till that is made public you don't throw away science on the grounds of a disgruntled spook.
Pretty rare Saager doesn't have a shit take.
‘Chinese dick sucking factory’ trends after Jordan Peterson shares false China claim