George W. Bush Approval Rating High, More Popular Than Obama
Zipperfish @ Thu Jun 13, 2013 8:50 am
Regina Regina:
romanP romanP:
if it's really that important to you... i made a different account since i hadn't logged into the iceowl account in a long time. there were disputes about the rules, but i argued that the rule the mods were attempting to apply to me didn't satisfy the circumstances and won with the deletion of the old account.
You were asked to pick one or the other and use it. No one gets to post under 2 seperate accounts here. Pretty simple rule actually.
But it would be so much fun arguing with myself!
raydan @ Thu Jun 13, 2013 1:53 pm
Zipperfish Zipperfish:
Regina Regina:
romanP romanP:
if it's really that important to you... i made a different account since i hadn't logged into the iceowl account in a long time. there were disputes about the rules, but i argued that the rule the mods were attempting to apply to me didn't satisfy the circumstances and won with the deletion of the old account.
You were asked to pick one or the other and use it. No one gets to post under 2 seperate accounts here. Pretty simple rule actually.
But it would be so much fun arguing with myself!
It hasn't stopped you yet.
BartSimpson @ Thu Jun 13, 2013 1:58 pm
GreenTiger GreenTiger:
It would be real interesting if Obama manages to "beat" Jimmy Carter into being the President we most wanted to see leave office.
I'm thinking Obama should lead the way to Mars by moving there.
Now.
http://mars-one.com/en/mission/mankind-on-mars
stratos @ Thu Jun 13, 2013 2:07 pm
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
GreenTiger GreenTiger:
It would be real interesting if Obama manages to "beat" Jimmy Carter into being the President we most wanted to see leave office.
I'm thinking Obama should lead the way to Mars by moving there.
Now.
http://mars-one.com/en/mission/mankind-on-mars
Great Bart now I have the image of Obama in a space suit pointing up at the sky saying "To space and beyond, yes we can"
romanP @ Thu Jun 13, 2013 2:42 pm
Regina Regina:
romanP romanP:
if it's really that important to you... i made a different account since i hadn't logged into the iceowl account in a long time. there were disputes about the rules, but i argued that the rule the mods were attempting to apply to me didn't satisfy the circumstances and won with the deletion of the old account.
You were asked to pick one or the other and use it. No one gets to post under 2 seperate accounts here. Pretty simple rule actually.
lesigh.. do you really want to rehash this? it was stupid in the first place. i logged into the old account ONCE by ACCIDENT, and you tore a strip out of me like I was using it regularly. get a fucking life.
BartSimpson @ Thu Jun 13, 2013 3:41 pm
Regina Regina:
No one gets to post under 2 seperate accounts here. Pretty simple rule actually.
Not to be difficult, but I recall that someone here (a moderator?) routinely uses two different accounts.
Public_Domain @ Thu Jun 13, 2013 4:23 pm
martin14 @ Thu Jun 13, 2013 9:12 pm
romanP romanP:
get a fucking life.
You are very quick to tell others what you don't have yourself.
BeaverFever @ Thu Jun 13, 2013 10:01 pm
$1:
Remember Sarah Palin's 'Death Panels'? Long story short: She was right.
Lacking. In so many ways.
Zipperfish @ Thu Jun 13, 2013 11:15 pm
romanP romanP:
Regina Regina:
romanP romanP:
if it's really that important to you... i made a different account since i hadn't logged into the iceowl account in a long time. there were disputes about the rules, but i argued that the rule the mods were attempting to apply to me didn't satisfy the circumstances and won with the deletion of the old account.
You were asked to pick one or the other and use it. No one gets to post under 2 seperate accounts here. Pretty simple rule actually.
lesigh.. do you really want to rehash this? it was stupid in the first place. i logged into the old account ONCE by ACCIDENT, and you tore a strip out of me like I was using it regularly. get a fucking life.
Settle down, roman.
stratos @ Fri Jun 14, 2013 12:13 pm
martin14 martin14:
romanP romanP:
get a fucking life.
You are very quick to tell others what you don't have yourself.
Don't worry Martin you'll get to have one in Italy
Psudo @ Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:21 am
DanSC DanSC:
If next year's implementation of Health Care Reform is executed in a disastrous fashion, which is very likely, the President could easily fall below 30%.
I will never understand why the Administration agreed to fully implement the law during an election year.
Could that have been part of the negotiation with Republicans?I will never understand why the Administration agreed to fully implement the law during an election year.
<Repubs> We don't want ObamaCare! It's gonna ruin American health care!
<Dems> Wanna make a wager on that? we'll implement it in an election year; if it works, we'll win all over the place. If it doesn't, you'll win the election and come racing to America's rescue.
<Repub Swing Voters> Hrm... I like that idea. We'll take back the country!
Jabberwalker @ Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:23 am
Psudo Psudo:
DanSC DanSC:
If next year's implementation of Health Care Reform is executed in a disastrous fashion, which is very likely, the President could easily fall below 30%.
I will never understand why the Administration agreed to fully implement the law during an election year.
Could that have been part of the negotiation with Republicans?I will never understand why the Administration agreed to fully implement the law during an election year.
<Repubs> We don't want ObamaCare! It's gonna ruin American health care!
<Dems> Wanna make a wager on that? we'll implement it in an election year; if it works, we'll win all over the place. If it doesn't, you'll win the election and come racing to America's rescue.
<Repub Swing Voters> Hrm... I like that idea. We'll take back the country!
How much more ruined can your health care get, anyway?
Psudo @ Wed Aug 07, 2013 4:31 pm
Republicans tend to look to best-case outcomes rather than average outcomes when judging the quality of a health care system. The USA has, if you can afford it, some of the top outcomes in the world. It's the "if you can afford it" qualifier that Democrats don't like.
Edit: in case it wasn't clear, it's the best-case outcomes Republicans are afraid ObamaCare will lower. That's what ObamaCare is all about, after all; prioritizing equal access.
Zipperfish @ Wed Aug 07, 2013 4:53 pm
Psudo Psudo:
Republicans tend to look to best-case outcomes rather than average outcomes when judging the quality of a health care system. The USA has, if you can afford it, some of the top outcomes in the world. It's the "if you can afford it" qualifier that Democrats don't like.
I'd agree with that. And when you add them all together into gross indices such as infant mortality and life expectancy, you could barely fit a piece of paper between the stats for the US and Canada.