Canada Kicks Ass
Canada's Anti-Americanism

REPLY

Previous  1  2  3  4  5 ... 7  Next



RUEZ @ Thu Oct 12, 2006 9:33 pm

Mr_Canada Mr_Canada:

I vote Foe though, :P Why? Because. I want their hand out of Canada's pocket. And Canada's life. We can be friends, sure as hell sure. But god, LEAVE US ALONE AND MIND YOUR OWN FRICKEN' CRAP, EH!? 85% Dependant. Gah.
Could you please explain this hand out of Canada's pocket. I don't get it.

   



grainfedprairieboy @ Thu Oct 12, 2006 9:34 pm

Banff Banff:
no offense but you sound like the author .


None taken (in Canada its "offence"). If I had authored it I would have been much harder on Canada because that kind of crap coming from the IR poll has no place in my Canada. These people did not deserve to die and trying to justify it in any shape or form is for us, a national embarrassment.

   



grainfedprairieboy @ Thu Oct 12, 2006 9:39 pm

Mr_Canada Mr_Canada:
I vote Foe though, :P Why? Because. I want their hand out of Canada's pocket. And Canada's life. We can be friends, sure as hell sure. But god, LEAVE US ALONE AND MIND YOUR OWN FRICKEN' CRAP, EH!? 85% Dependant. Gah.


Your Liberals once created an organisation called FIRA which did little to stamp out US imperialism but much to plunge Canada into the deepest recession since the Great Depression.

You're young. Once you start working and raising a family you'll see the error in your ways and start voting responsibly.

   



SireJoe @ Thu Oct 12, 2006 9:44 pm

There is rarely ever justification in killing people. But there are reasons behind everything people do. A group of people dont just get up one day and decide to blow up major centres in the US. It just doesnt work that way. There reasons may not be just, or thier actions right, but they had reasons to do what they did. It wasnt just out of the blue. So yes, the US does have to take blame, the US governments forgien policy has been pretty fucked up. This would appear to be a product of that policy.

That being said. The american public should NOT be the ones who take the brunt end of an attack. It was not the civilians who decided that policy, so attacking them is nothing more than cowardice at its finest.

For someone to say otherwise, that it was deserving of the 3000+ people who died, is ludicrous.


Edit: fixed sillee spleling mustake.

   



Mr_Canada old @ Thu Oct 12, 2006 9:47 pm

grainfedprairieboy grainfedprairieboy:
Mr_Canada Mr_Canada:
I vote Foe though, :P Why? Because. I want their hand out of Canada's pocket. And Canada's life. We can be friends, sure as hell sure. But god, LEAVE US ALONE AND MIND YOUR OWN FRICKEN' CRAP, EH!? 85% Dependant. Gah.


Your Liberals once created an organisation called FIRA which did little to stamp out US imperialism but much to plunge Canada into the deepest recession since the Great Depression.

You're young. Once you start working and raising a family you'll see the error in your ways and start voting responsibly.
ROTFL Yes yes, Age. Of course. Anyway.

Did the FIRA try and replace the US or did it just try and get rid of it? I don't know anything about the FIRA, so please explain to me a little more about them. Intelligently please. Not "Fuck the Liberals" every 2 seconds.

   



Indelible @ Thu Oct 12, 2006 9:48 pm

ludicrous.

ludacris is a 'rapper' :lol:

   



Mr_Canada old @ Thu Oct 12, 2006 9:51 pm

RUEZ RUEZ:
Mr_Canada Mr_Canada:

I vote Foe though, :P Why? Because. I want their hand out of Canada's pocket. And Canada's life. We can be friends, sure as hell sure. But god, LEAVE US ALONE AND MIND YOUR OWN FRICKEN' CRAP, EH!? 85% Dependant. Gah.
Could you please explain this hand out of Canada's pocket. I don't get it.

Scamming us out of money, Feeble attempts to steal from us,

You know.

   



Banff @ Thu Oct 12, 2006 9:54 pm

GFPB
Trade is simple : If you have it and others need it you should fork it over but you should be treated fairly and approach your need cautiously as not to interfere with that countrys need or future generations .

Religion : In the Mideast peoples heads get chopped off and in the US their heads hang from a rope (Christianity vs Islam / Savage vs Civilized )
If you invade a country expect the vigile retaliation such as 9/11 or Israel possessing Arab land and although it sounds like a double standard the issue of 9/11 has to met with consequences ( inevitably ) how those consequences are met is another story . "simple "

   



RUEZ @ Thu Oct 12, 2006 9:55 pm

Mr_Canada Mr_Canada:
RUEZ RUEZ:
Mr_Canada Mr_Canada:

I vote Foe though, :P Why? Because. I want their hand out of Canada's pocket. And Canada's life. We can be friends, sure as hell sure. But god, LEAVE US ALONE AND MIND YOUR OWN FRICKEN' CRAP, EH!? 85% Dependant. Gah.
Could you please explain this hand out of Canada's pocket. I don't get it.

Scamming us out of money, Feeble attempts to steal from us,

You know.
You have any examples of this?

   



Banff @ Thu Oct 12, 2006 9:57 pm

grainfedprairieboy grainfedprairieboy:
Banff Banff:
no offense but you sound like the author .


None taken (in Canada its "offence"). If I had authored it I would have been much harder on Canada because that kind of crap coming from the IR poll has no place in my Canada. These people did not deserve to die and trying to justify it in any shape or form is for us, a national embarrassment.


If your freind is doing something the wrong way its best you tell him or you're not much of a freind :wink:

   



grainfedprairieboy @ Thu Oct 12, 2006 10:10 pm

SireJoe SireJoe:
There is rarely ever justification in killing people. But there are reasons behind everything people do. A group of people dont just get up one day and decide to blow up major centres in the US. It just doesnt work that way. There reasons may not be just, or thier actions right, but they had reasons to do what they did. It wasnt just out of the blue. So yes, the US does have to take blame, the US governments forgien policy has been pretty fucked up. This would appear to be a product of that policy.


It may appear that way but Islamofascism has been going on long before there was a USA. If you want recent times and an explanation closer to your own century then I suggest you familiarise yourself with Wahhabism in addition to becoming more acquainted with our philosophical differences in cognitive reasoning.

I can assure you that the USA is only targeted for being the foundation for all the Western nations and not one policy over another. Canada’s same sex marriage policy and interference in the reproductive habits and support of rights of women in Muslim countries should have bought our premature annihilation but we have so far been ignored.

SireJoe SireJoe:
That being said. The american public should NOT be the ones who take the brunt end of an attack. It was not the civilians who decided that policy, so attacking them is nothing more than cowardice at its finest.


Wrong again. It is not cowardice. You are using Eurocentric thought by suggesting that people who commit aggressive acts do so out of cowardice rather then malice. They are no more a coward then the enemy soldier who shoots your unwitting FTP. You need to stop regarding them as aggrieved victims.

SireJoe SireJoe:
For someone to say otherwise, that it was deserving of the 3000+ people who died, is ludacris.


Agreed.

   



grainfedprairieboy @ Thu Oct 12, 2006 10:13 pm

Banff Banff:
If your freind is doing something the wrong way its best you tell him or you're not much of a freind :wink:


And is that not what the author is in fact doing?

   



SireJoe @ Thu Oct 12, 2006 10:18 pm

The US forgein policy hasnt always been what it is today. Or for the past 20-50 years. Sticking thier nose in other peoples business wasnt always priority number 1....like it is now.

So no I completely disagree with you. There are reasons behind what they did and are doing. It wasnt a 'just because' or 'because we can' mentality.

And cowardice is arbitrary. Call it whatever the hell you want. Its the same shit. They couldnt get thier way into the top offices of government so they went for the next best thing. Without having to face the consequences of thier actions in the aftermath. Cowardice to me.

   



grainfedprairieboy @ Thu Oct 12, 2006 10:37 pm

SireJoe SireJoe:
The US forgein policy hasnt always been what it is today. Or for the past 20-50 years. Sticking thier nose in other peoples business wasnt always priority number 1....like it is now.

So no I completely disagree with you. There are reasons behind what they did and are doing. It wasnt a 'just because' or 'because we can' mentality.


By Rabbi Aryeh Spero:

As with those in the mid-1800s unwilling to accept the transformation from an agricultural era to the new era of industrialization, most elitist liberals refuse to admit the reality of the new jihadist era since it makes irrelevant the entrenched ideas upon which they have grown rich and sassy for the last half century. At stake is their status. It is similar to the advent of the early automobile period when buggy-whip manufacturers would not reconcile themselves to a new reality rendering what they did outdated and unnecessary.

Jihadism is not a reaction to American, Israeli or Australian foreign policy. It is organic, a conventional and historic reading of the Koran as understood by many imams. Jihad is one of Islam’s authentic traditions, predating the birth of America and Israel. They seek to conquer, to create a global Islamic caliphate. Our survival depends on their defeat, total defeat. This will be accomplished not by the professional negotiators and liberal sociologists but by the force of an army, a courageous and unfettered military.

Those schooled in the liberal “it’s society’s fault” outlook when pontificating on domestic crime have for decades proclaimed “it’s America’s fault” when evaluating every atrocity found worldwide. Liberals “understand”!

To acknowledge the peculiarity of the jihadist reality undermines those in the “understanding” business. They are, now, antiquated and counterproductive, since it is not their assumptions that anymore matter but the generals and the fighting man. Liberals would rather deny truth than forfeit their heretofore prominent position at the decision table.

   



Banff @ Thu Oct 12, 2006 10:39 pm

grainfedprairieboy grainfedprairieboy:
Banff Banff:
If your freind is doing something the wrong way its best you tell him or you're not much of a freind :wink:


And is that not what the author is in fact doing?


I thought we were right and they were always wrong :lol: silly me :oops:
...anyway I give credit to the author for one very hidden reason , and that being the advances in world nuclear capabilities so much so it leaves a suspicion toward the possibilities of WW3 ( which I highly doubt anytime soon but see increases in war looming about in the near future ) possibly causing the US to cautiously /nervously step out of line ( way out of line ) with foreign policies . Having said that it is appropriate to act like an ali with all your allies abut at the same time let the libs and anti war protestors hold down the lid on the boiling Kettle .
Sometimes I think the relationship between the US and Canada is very much like the story of Caine and Abel . Harper needlessly thinks we have to repair some kind of superficial damage infact many people think the same thing . Americans often say we act and talk the same and infact this is true but the subtle differences will always be there just as obvious as two brothers would be ..

   



REPLY

Previous  1  2  3  4  5 ... 7  Next