How does Canada have more freedom then America?
Previous 1 ... 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ... 31 Next
flyman01 @ Mon Apr 25, 2005 8:47 pm
Answer the question, did Bush do all he could do to mend ties with N Korea and try diplomacy?
Constantinople @ Mon Apr 25, 2005 8:55 pm
flyman01 flyman01:
Answer the question, did Bush do all he could do to mend ties with N Korea and try diplomacy?
First off, we ain't at war with North Korea yet so the chance for dimplomacy hasn't ended yet.
TheUSofA1776 TheUSofA1776:
flyman01 flyman01:
$1:
NYCisHome
If Communism is so great why dont you all move to Cuba.
If Communism is so great why dont you all move to Cuba.
I would but my goverment wouldnt let me .
Actually you are wrong about N Korea building Nukes during the Clinton years. They halted completly we had inspectors.
Yeah, and so much for the 1994 Agreed Framework! That's a laugh- old Jimma Carter's work on that totally fell through...ah, the laughable years of Clinton.
Secondly, the Agreed Framework of 1994 shows what diplomacy does. Read up on it. Basically it's the U.S. giving billions to North Korea to help build a power plants for their dying nation- but they turned around and used it to pursue nuclear weapons, building them well within Clinton's years. Appeasement is not the answer- that is why I laugh at the diplomacy of the Clinton years. Such weakness and all it did was shove the problems into the future.
flyman01 @ Mon Apr 25, 2005 9:00 pm
Weakness? Define weakness. No nukes went off during his time. Im sure within the next decade due to Bushs tactics we will see a nuclear devise use in that region.
Constantinople @ Mon Apr 25, 2005 9:03 pm
flyman01 flyman01:
Weakness? Define weakness. No nukes went off during his time. Im sure within the next decade due to Bushs tactics we will see a nuclear devise use in that region.
You are funny. I've basically shown you that Clinton's diplomacy failed. And no, we will see a nuclear device used in that region not because of Bush's tactics but because of the billions they were alloted from the Agreed Framework. Your naivety is really showin' through on this topic...
flyman01 @ Mon Apr 25, 2005 9:10 pm
Whatever makes you sleep at night, just remember under who's watch did we balance the budget, not Bush's thats for sure.
Constantinople @ Mon Apr 25, 2005 9:14 pm
flyman01 flyman01:
Whatever makes you sleep at night, just remember under who's watch did we balance the budget, not Bush's thats for sure.
Haha, how typical that you would change the subject instead of facing the facts. You're probably pissin your pants cuz you don't even know what the hell the Agreed Framework is.
flyman01 @ Mon Apr 25, 2005 9:15 pm
could bush balance the budget? NO
Constantinople @ Mon Apr 25, 2005 9:22 pm
flyman01 flyman01:
could bush balance the budget? NO
Kinda hard when he's got to clean up Clinton's mess.
flyman01 @ Mon Apr 25, 2005 9:31 pm
$1:
Clinton's mess
What mess?
Constantinople @ Mon Apr 25, 2005 9:36 pm
flyman01 flyman01:
$1:
Clinton's mess
What mess?
The Agreed Framework mess. Duh...
Scape @ Mon Apr 25, 2005 11:12 pm
Да, yet another диаграмма вещей улучшая под Clinton и понижаясь врозь под кустик
Legion @ Tue Apr 26, 2005 12:05 am
Scape speak in English please.
Constantinople @ Tue Apr 26, 2005 3:24 am
He used the chart as being sarcastic and saying: "Yes, yet another diagram showing things improving under Clinton and going down separately under Bush."
How is that worthy of death by laughter? It's actually pathetic since no one here is facing up to the disasterous failed Agreed Framework that Clinton and Carter passed off as the best thing since sliced bread.
BeaverBill @ Tue Apr 26, 2005 3:56 am
Check out these links.
"Behind the UN oil for food programme
Iraq: the real sanctions scandal"
http://mondediplo.com/2005/02/05irak?va ... +sanctions
If you can read French....
Canada slides towards becoming a police state.
http://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/2005/02/GOURD/12124
Previous 1 ... 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ... 31 Next