How does Canada have more freedom then America?
BeaverBill BeaverBill:
In the end, who is reponsible for the sanctions?
flyman01 flyman01:
Whatever makes you sleep at night, just remember under who's watch did we balance the budget, not Bush's thats for sure.
Great way to deflect the topic. Were we not talking about how Kim jong mentaly ill took our money and used towards making a nuke. Good ole Madaline Albright sold this lemon to the American people.
NYCisHome NYCisHome:
flyman01 flyman01:
Whatever makes you sleep at night, just remember under who's watch did we balance the budget, not Bush's thats for sure.
Great way to deflect the topic. Were we not talking about how Kim jong mentaly ill took our money and used towards making a nuke. Good ole Madaline Albright sold this lemon to the American people.
Thank you my fellow flamer!
$1:
In the end, who is reponsible for the sanctions?
Sorry, don't catch your drift.
I'll reply quickly anyways, the UN.
BeaverBill BeaverBill:
$1:
In the end, who is reponsible for the sanctions?
Sorry, don't catch your drift.
I'll reply quickly anyways, the UN.
Nope, wrong. Saddam was.
I think the story is a bit deeper, but I can't disagree. Saddam was a ruthless twat and deserves to be cleaned. Sanctions, in theory, was a good idea. The problem comes on how to read the mismanagement of the issue. The UN is only as good as its parts. Where did it really fail? If you soley listen to Bush, the blame lays elsewhere. Since it has been placed into fashion to discredit the UN, made of its many parts, which parts failed the process to result the outcome of war? Obviously, in my humble opinion, (and it seems many others) this wasn't about democracy. The UN has been scape goated and discredited on a international level for the benefit of a few. As for Saddam, cap the fucker for all I care, but don't stop there, cap his accomplices and those who proped the fucker up. They are equally guilty. Then there will be justice.
TheUSofA1776 TheUSofA1776:
BeaverBill BeaverBill:
$1:
In the end, who is reponsible for the sanctions?
Sorry, don't catch your drift.
I'll reply quickly anyways, the UN.
Nope, wrong. Saddam was.
Actually, it WAS the UN. Please do yourself a favor and open a history book and read it.
Legion @ Tue Apr 26, 2005 11:39 am
$1:
BeaverBill
$1:
As for Saddam, cap the fucker for all I care, but don't stop there, cap his accomplices and those who proped the fucker up.
Yes, yes, now we are making progress here.
Arctic_Menace Arctic_Menace:
TheUSofA1776 TheUSofA1776:
BeaverBill BeaverBill:
$1:
In the end, who is reponsible for the sanctions?
Sorry, don't catch your drift.
I'll reply quickly anyways, the UN.
Nope, wrong. Saddam was.
Actually, it WAS the UN. Please do yourself a favor and open a history book and read it.
Listen to the Beaver.
TheUSofA1776 TheUSofA1776:
Arctic_Menace Arctic_Menace:
TheUSofA1776 TheUSofA1776:
BeaverBill BeaverBill:
$1:
In the end, who is reponsible for the sanctions?
Sorry, don't catch your drift.
I'll reply quickly anyways, the UN.
Nope, wrong. Saddam was.
Actually, it WAS the UN. Please do yourself a favor and open a history book and read it.
Listen to the Beaver.
The hell does that mean?? Man, ten year olds these days don't make sense do they??
Arctic_Menace Arctic_Menace:
TheUSofA1776 TheUSofA1776:
Arctic_Menace Arctic_Menace:
TheUSofA1776 TheUSofA1776:
BeaverBill BeaverBill:
$1:
In the end, who is reponsible for the sanctions?
Sorry, don't catch your drift.
I'll reply quickly anyways, the UN.
Nope, wrong. Saddam was.
Actually, it WAS the UN. Please do yourself a favor and open a history book and read it.
Listen to the Beaver.
The hell does that mean?? Man, ten year olds these days don't make sense do they??

He's a poster in the forum.
TheUSofA1776 TheUSofA1776:
Arctic_Menace Arctic_Menace:
TheUSofA1776 TheUSofA1776:
Arctic_Menace Arctic_Menace:
TheUSofA1776 TheUSofA1776:
BeaverBill BeaverBill:
$1:
In the end, who is reponsible for the sanctions?
Sorry, don't catch your drift.
I'll reply quickly anyways, the UN.
Nope, wrong. Saddam was.
Actually, it WAS the UN. Please do yourself a favor and open a history book and read it.
Listen to the Beaver.
The hell does that mean?? Man, ten year olds these days don't make sense do they??

He's a poster in the forum.
Point being?? Come on man!!! Give me a good answer!!
All those that propped Saddam up includes the US admin. of then, which now do all the work behind Bush Jr. (Funny how the story gets twisted around). They ( Rumsfeld to name one) were shaking Saddam's hand as he gased the Kurds, another reason why Iraq needed to be invaded (double speak). The US is just cleaning up their own mess, a plan built up over many long years.
RUEZ @ Tue Apr 26, 2005 12:29 pm
That reminds me of something funny I heard, I think it was on Air Farce.
The reason the U.S. is so sure that Iraq had WMD is because they have the reciepts at home. 