Canada Kicks Ass
U.S. Troops Asked If They Would Shoot American Citizens

REPLY

Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next



Public_Domain @ Sun Feb 10, 2008 11:59 am

:|

   



Tricks @ Sun Feb 10, 2008 12:43 pm

Bill_Hicks Bill_Hicks:
Tricks Tricks:
Bill_Hicks Bill_Hicks:
ziggy ziggy:
Bill_Hicks Bill_Hicks:
Regina Regina:
Bill_Hicks Bill_Hicks:
Schleihauf Schleihauf:
I wonder if cops get the same questionaire.
:|

The American Army prides itself on Always defending the American people from harm.

The Police prides itself on stopping people from committing crimes.

There's a difference.


What situation would the US army be called out with arms, without the intent of stopping crime?
Why must people find loop holes in my phrases? Must I state everything so that ever possibility for a comeback is covered? Can't things just you know speak for themselves?

The American Police prides itself on stopping American people from committing crimes.

The police mainly deal with the instability of it's nation's people... And their's always debate on how they handle that.


Your bias is showing in your posts. I'll chaulk it up to your age.
Bias?

You mean Anti-American bias, left-wing bias, what kind?

Because of course I freaking do.

Everyone freaking has bias.
Speak for yourself, not everyone else.

Oh, and you're a complete tard.
*shakes head* Fucking idiot.

It ziggy, or yourself, did not have a bias, you'd be centre-winged. You don't have OUTSTANDING bias, but you certainly fucking have bias. Idiots.
Um... No you twit. Being left or right wing means you have that opinion on issues, not a bias you stupid fuck. Learn what the word means before tossing it around.

   



dino_bobba_renno @ Sun Feb 10, 2008 4:57 pm

Bill_Hicks Bill_Hicks:
Tricks Tricks:
Bill_Hicks Bill_Hicks:
ziggy ziggy:
Bill_Hicks Bill_Hicks:
Regina Regina:
Bill_Hicks Bill_Hicks:
Schleihauf Schleihauf:
I wonder if cops get the same questionaire.
:|

The American Army prides itself on Always defending the American people from harm.

The Police prides itself on stopping people from committing crimes.

There's a difference.


What situation would the US army be called out with arms, without the intent of stopping crime?
Why must people find loop holes in my phrases? Must I state everything so that ever possibility for a comeback is covered? Can't things just you know speak for themselves?

The American Police prides itself on stopping American people from committing crimes.

The police mainly deal with the instability of it's nation's people... And their's always debate on how they handle that.


Your bias is showing in your posts. I'll chaulk it up to your age.
Bias?

You mean Anti-American bias, left-wing bias, what kind?

Because of course I freaking do.

Everyone freaking has bias.
Speak for yourself, not everyone else.

Oh, and you're a complete tard.
*shakes head* Fucking idiot.

It ziggy, or yourself, did not have a bias, you'd be centre-winged. You don't have OUTSTANDING bias, but you certainly fucking have bias. Idiots.


Lets try to keep things a bit more civil in here guys, you may feel strongly about your own position but agrue the points. There's no need for name calling or flaming :wink:

   



BartSimpson @ Mon Feb 11, 2008 9:56 am

martin14 martin14:
During hurricane Katrina, National Guard units were ordered to confiscate guns belonging to New Orleans residents.

If i remember, they were using those firearms to shoot at police

and rescue services.. takes a real man to shoot at an ambulance..



At the time this what was being said by the local government to justify an unConstitutional seizure of lawfully owned firearms.

Several incidents where police shot and killed "armed" refugees later turned out to be acts of murder against unarmed citizens who were desperate to escape the hellhole that New Orleans became after the storm. Seven police officers have been convicted of these crimes so far with some twenty more still pending convictions for civil rights violations and etc.

The Federal Courts ruled the seizure of the lawfully owned arms to be illegal and the City of New Orleans has been found in contempt of court for initially refusing to return legally owned arms to their proper owners.

A friend of mine who works for Blackwater was doing security for the media in New Orleans and said he'd repeatedly had problems with LEO's who tried to steal media vehicles, their supplies, and he said the LEO's repeatedly and illegally tried to disarm him and his people several times and several times he came close to combat with LEO's.

The biggest problem in New Orleans after the storm was not with armed citizens, but with cops acting illegally and inhumanly.

   



BartSimpson @ Mon Feb 11, 2008 9:57 am

Also, I was once asked if I would shoot at American citizens if ordered to and my reply was that I would not hesitate one second to shoot the person who gave the order.

I was never asked the question again.

   



Public_Domain @ Mon Feb 11, 2008 6:37 pm

:|

   



Public_Domain @ Mon Feb 11, 2008 6:38 pm

:|

   



Tricks @ Mon Feb 11, 2008 7:59 pm

Bill_Hicks Bill_Hicks:
Tricks Tricks:
Um... No you twit. Being left or right wing means you have that opinion on issues, not a bias you stupid fuck. Learn what the word means before tossing it around.
:arrow:

bias
n.
Definition: belief in one way; partiality
- Answers.com

Belief in One Way, ie. an OPINION. Often favouring ONE SIDE.

Everyone is biased.
No you twit. Saying I liked what Harper did at one time is an opinion. That doesn't stop me from saying he fucked up on something else. If I said that Harper can do no wrong and should be grand poobah, that's bias. Man go back to school.

   



Ruxpercnd @ Mon Feb 11, 2008 9:22 pm

This is actually a good topic if you can discuss it honestly. Probably most bullets in the world are fired by one citizen at another fellow citizen. That is the nature of guns.

However... on the issue of military ordered strikes. Yea, it is in the oath... all enemies foreign and domestic.

In the U.S. Navy I was in a rifle squad trained to face off against fellow Americans. We had rifles and bayonets... but were not issued bullets. I told my fellow riflemen that I intended not to shoot anybody. We were called out to the front gate of the base, but the supposed threat did not show up as the intelligence had warned, so we stood down... a non event, except we had been training for it and we did assemble for action. However it made me think. There are some things that were not talked about too much and never made the news.

Most civilians didn't know that there were contingencies for domestic action, but I was there and did the training, lots of bayonet drills.... We were told specifically that we were training for civil unrest. I think there were second thoughts because this seemed to be a phase that came and went.

Of course the National Guard has been called out many times. Soldiers will tend to follow their training and think about it later.

My recommendation though is that if a soldier with a gun tells you to leave the area.. it would be a good idea to leave.

   



Tricks @ Mon Feb 11, 2008 9:35 pm

BartSimpson BartSimpson:
Also, I was once asked if I would shoot at American citizens if ordered to and my reply was that I would not hesitate one second to shoot the person who gave the order.

I was never asked the question again.
What if those American citizens were enemies of the state?

   



Public_Domain @ Mon Feb 11, 2008 9:52 pm

:|

   



Joe_Stalin @ Mon Feb 11, 2008 9:55 pm

$1:
U.S. Troops Asked If They Would Shoot American Citizens



Ever wonder why Mikey Moore et al is never hardly seen in public?

   



Public_Domain @ Mon Feb 11, 2008 9:56 pm

:|

   



Public_Domain @ Mon Feb 11, 2008 9:57 pm

:|

   



Joe_Stalin @ Mon Feb 11, 2008 10:29 pm

Try "hardly ever" then.

   



REPLY

Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next