Unions in ontario launch attack ads before election
Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 9 Next
sasquatch2 @ Mon Aug 20, 2007 2:22 pm
Mustang1
$1:
Ewww....dumb dumb caught a minor typo. So? I admit it and unlike you, I'll concede my mistake, but perhaps while you're playing prose police you could correct the spelling of "proficiency" and "Your rules" as it's a fragment. So I guess, we can deduce that the best education you've managed to swindle is Grade 6? Nice work, window-licker! Damn, Bongo, kickin' your trashcan intellect is far too easy.
Game. Set. Match.
Game. Set. Match.
HEE HEE HEE HAW HAW HAW HEE HEE HEE HAW HAW HAW HEE HEE HEE HAW HAW HAW HEE HEE HEE HAW HAW HAW HEE HEE HEE HAW HAW HAW HEE HEE HEE HAW HAW HAW HEE HEE HEE HAW HAW HAW
snicker
HOCKEY PUCK
ryan29 @ Mon Aug 20, 2007 5:18 pm
Benoit Benoit:
hwacker hwacker:
Unions are useless and need to be outlawed. They only protect the lazy ones in society.
Unions are very useful, they are forcing profiteers to share their undeserved incomes. Profiteers are making their money not by taking real risks but by cultivating frendships among politicians and public officers.
in modern ontario who really needs unions , i just don't see the need or understand why people would want to be told how to vote for by people like buzz hargrove.
Mustang1 @ Mon Aug 20, 2007 6:00 pm
sasquatch2 sasquatch2:
Mustang1
HEE HEE HEE HAW HAW HAW HEE HEE HEE HAW HAW HAW HEE HEE HEE HAW HAW HAW HEE HEE HEE HAW HAW HAW HEE HEE HEE HAW HAW HAW HEE HEE HEE HAW HAW HAW HEE HEE HEE HAW HAW HAW
snicker
HOCKEY PUCK
$1:
Ewww....dumb dumb caught a minor typo. So? I admit it and unlike you, I'll concede my mistake, but perhaps while you're playing prose police you could correct the spelling of "proficiency" and "Your rules" as it's a fragment. So I guess, we can deduce that the best education you've managed to swindle is Grade 6? Nice work, window-licker! Damn, Bongo, kickin' your trashcan intellect is far too easy.
Game. Set. Match.
Game. Set. Match.
HEE HEE HEE HAW HAW HAW HEE HEE HEE HAW HAW HAW HEE HEE HEE HAW HAW HAW HEE HEE HEE HAW HAW HAW HEE HEE HEE HAW HAW HAW HEE HEE HEE HAW HAW HAW HEE HEE HEE HAW HAW HAW
snicker
HOCKEY PUCK
Can you say, Meltdown? I think you can. In fact, I think you just had one.
Benoit @ Mon Aug 20, 2007 6:25 pm
ryan29 ryan29:
Benoit Benoit:
hwacker hwacker:
Unions are useless and need to be outlawed. They only protect the lazy ones in society.
Unions are very useful, they are forcing profiteers to share their undeserved incomes. Profiteers are making their money not by taking real risks but by cultivating frendships among politicians and public officers.
in modern ontario who really needs unions , i just don't see the need or understand why people would want to be told how to vote for by people like buzz hargrove.
Because the share of the national production that is going to capital increase too rapidly relative to the share received by labor.
BurytheNDPforgood @ Mon Aug 20, 2007 8:16 pm
Can someone answer a simple question for me:
Why is it that public "employees" are "privaleged" to have the ability to legally, collectively extort more taxpayers money out of the government?
What is the justification for this vs the real world ie. the market driven, performance measured accountability that people in the private sector have to live with every day?
I can't wait to read the responses.
Mustang1 @ Mon Aug 20, 2007 8:25 pm
BurytheNDPforgood BurytheNDPforgood:
Can someone answer a simple question for me:
Why is it that public "employees" are "privaleged" to have the ability to legally, collectively extort more taxpayers money out of the government?
What is the justification for this vs the real world ie. the market driven, performance measured accountability that people in the private sector have to live with every day?
I can't wait to read the responses.
Why is it that public "employees" are "privaleged" to have the ability to legally, collectively extort more taxpayers money out of the government?
What is the justification for this vs the real world ie. the market driven, performance measured accountability that people in the private sector have to live with every day?
I can't wait to read the responses.
You're demanding answers to questions? That's rich. How about first addressing, "Tell you what, you show me how "Harris took the education system away from the teachers unions", which i asked you on the first page? Sorry, not too tolerate of hypocrisy and the like.
BurytheNDPforgood @ Mon Aug 20, 2007 8:30 pm
Mustang1 Mustang1:
BurytheNDPforgood BurytheNDPforgood:
Can someone answer a simple question for me:
Why is it that public "employees" are "privaleged" to have the ability to legally, collectively extort more taxpayers money out of the government?
What is the justification for this vs the real world ie. the market driven, performance measured accountability that people in the private sector have to live with every day?
I can't wait to read the responses.
Why is it that public "employees" are "privaleged" to have the ability to legally, collectively extort more taxpayers money out of the government?
What is the justification for this vs the real world ie. the market driven, performance measured accountability that people in the private sector have to live with every day?
I can't wait to read the responses.
You're demanding answers to questions? That's rich. How about first addressing, "Tell you what, you show me how "Harris took the education system away from the teachers unions", which i asked you on the first page? Sorry, not too tolerate of hypocrisy and the like.
I was quoting a post before mine on that. I was saying that Harris had things right on those issues, based on the previous post.
Shall I send you some crayons and a colouring in book?
Mustang1 @ Mon Aug 20, 2007 8:34 pm
BurytheNDPforgood BurytheNDPforgood:
Mustang1 Mustang1:
BurytheNDPforgood BurytheNDPforgood:
Can someone answer a simple question for me:
Why is it that public "employees" are "privaleged" to have the ability to legally, collectively extort more taxpayers money out of the government?
What is the justification for this vs the real world ie. the market driven, performance measured accountability that people in the private sector have to live with every day?
I can't wait to read the responses.
Why is it that public "employees" are "privaleged" to have the ability to legally, collectively extort more taxpayers money out of the government?
What is the justification for this vs the real world ie. the market driven, performance measured accountability that people in the private sector have to live with every day?
I can't wait to read the responses.
You're demanding answers to questions? That's rich. How about first addressing, "Tell you what, you show me how "Harris took the education system away from the teachers unions", which i asked you on the first page? Sorry, not too tolerate of hypocrisy and the like.
I was quoting a post before mine on that. I was saying that Harris had things right on those issues, based on the previous post.
Shall I send you some crayons and a colouring in book?
And the last part of that quote was, "Harris took the educations system away from the teachers unions and put it back with the elected schoolboards and the Education ministry.
To which, i replied, "Tell you what, you show me how "Harris took the education system away from the teachers unions"
Keep your crayons, bib and diapers and learn how to read. Oh...and still waiting on that answer, genius.
BurytheNDPforgood @ Mon Aug 20, 2007 8:37 pm
Why don't you ask Sasquatch then? He's the one that posted it?
Still waiting for an answer justifying CUPE legalized extortion.
Don't try and deflect now, just get on with answering the question.
I'm all ears.
Benoit @ Mon Aug 20, 2007 8:40 pm
BurytheNDPforgood BurytheNDPforgood:
performance measured accountability that people in the private sector have to live with every day.
Dont you know the numerous Conrad Black of the private sector!?
Mustang1 @ Mon Aug 20, 2007 8:44 pm
BurytheNDPforgood BurytheNDPforgood:
Why don't you ask Sasquatch then? He's the one that posted it?
Still waiting for an answer justifying CUPE legalized extortion.
Don't try and deflect now, just get on with answering the question.
I'm all ears.
Still waiting for an answer justifying CUPE legalized extortion.
Don't try and deflect now, just get on with answering the question.
I'm all ears.
Actually you agreed with him, so i asked you to justify your support. Don't shirk your responsibility. You balked, but now you expect others to answer your questions? Naw. Practice what you preach.
$1:
"
Don't try and deflect now, just get on with answering the question."
Don't try and deflect now, just get on with answering the question."
This is coming from the guy that just got caught being a first rate hypocrite? Sorry...your currency is rather low.
$1:
"'i'm all ears"
Too bad it's not all brains
BurytheNDPforgood @ Mon Aug 20, 2007 9:09 pm
I was simply commenting on a previous post and agreeing with points made in it.
I don't know a lot about Ontario politics as I don't live there.
I was saying that he got things right, assuming that he did do what was said in the post by Sasquatch.
Do you want me to justify his post or Harris' actions? Perhaps you should ask him or Harris to do this?
In terms of my supporting the things that were posted.....Canada needs more Teachers Unions having their grubby, controlling little hands taken away from the helm of running the school systems across the country.
Now, would YOU please answer MY question?
Benoit @ Mon Aug 20, 2007 9:15 pm
BurytheNDPforgood BurytheNDPforgood:
legalized extortion.
What's wrong with workers stopping the work to force the employer to listen to there difficulties at work!?
BurytheNDPforgood @ Mon Aug 20, 2007 9:37 pm
Nothing as long as it's done individually, not collectively ie. you decide to protest by walking off the job, but are not allowed to gang up on your employer simply because they are a taxpayer funded monopoly. I'd like to see how far you would get with that, protesting on your own?
Why should certain sections of the workforce be allowed to to this and others not?
What is so special about people working in taxpayer funded unions?
Why are Canadian Union laws stuck in the 1970s when other developed nations have progressed?
hwacker @ Mon Aug 20, 2007 11:02 pm
BurytheNDPforgood BurytheNDPforgood:
Nothing as long as it's done individually, not collectively ie. you decide to protest by walking off the job, but are not allowed to gang up on your employer simply because they are a taxpayer funded monopoly. I'd like to see how far you would get with that, protesting on your own?
Why should certain sections of the workforce be allowed to to this and others not?
What is so special about people working in taxpayer funded unions?
Why are Canadian Union laws stuck in the 1970s when other developed nations have progressed?
Why should certain sections of the workforce be allowed to to this and others not?
What is so special about people working in taxpayer funded unions?
Why are Canadian Union laws stuck in the 1970s when other developed nations have progressed?
Ask the liberals or the ndp, they are the ones that keep propping them up.
Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 9 Next