Harper tells Toronto to Kiss His Albertan Ass
Previous 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 15 Next
Ruserious @ Sat Jan 14, 2006 4:30 pm
EyeBrock EyeBrock:
Old chap, the difference is you have been proven wrong and I have been proven right, crying apart that is the difference.
Care to discuss something else you don't know anything about?
I can give you a list of topics I'm particularly knowledgeable on so you can be proven wrong even quicker next time if you'd like?
Now I feel pity for you EyeBrock.
Care to discuss something else you don't know anything about?
I can give you a list of topics I'm particularly knowledgeable on so you can be proven wrong even quicker next time if you'd like?
Not only have you admitted that you're a failure in 2 countries you can't even see that you've been proven wrong not only by me but DerbyX as well.
Seriously, I'm embarrassed for you.
Ruserious @ Sat Jan 14, 2006 4:38 pm
dimoreien dimoreien:
Ok Seriously, do you guys do this all the time because you don't like each other, or because you get a kick out of it, or both? (Eyebrock and Ruserious)
Sarcasm is totally wasted on the internet.
Myself, I get a kick out of running idiots like EyeBrock.
Sarcasm is totally wasted on the internet.
But I'd still sit down and have a beer with most people on here.
EyeBrock @ Sat Jan 14, 2006 4:44 pm
Oh you showed me ruserious!
You are indeed an able debator!
Pity you are wrong so often though eh?
danikyvor @ Sat Jan 14, 2006 4:48 pm
I think I'll just leave you two to it... LOL
Wullu @ Sat Jan 14, 2006 4:49 pm
Ruserious Ruserious:
Wullu Wullu:
Ruserious Ruserious:
Wullu Wullu:
Well EyeBrock
That it is just Ruserious's way of refusing to admit to defeat. When he starts swearing and calling folks all sorts of not very inventive names he knows he is loosing an arguement. He tried in vane to cuss me out a week or so ago, but after being a miner for 5 years and a sailor for 15 his vocabulary just was not up to the task
nothing new there at all
I tried to outcuss you? $1:
Jackass eh? Tut tut. Not a very English expression old bean
That it is just Ruserious's way of refusing to admit to defeat. When he starts swearing and calling folks all sorts of not very inventive names he knows he is loosing an arguement. He tried in vane to cuss me out a week or so ago, but after being a miner for 5 years and a sailor for 15 his vocabulary just was not up to the task
nothing new there at allSorry wullu, you're giving yourself way too much credit.
You don't even rate.
So soon they forget, and at least I had the common courtesy to spell yer name correctly
And you did not try to out cuss me. I was winning and argument ( forget which now...) so you started off yer rant with a string of colourful language. I did not feel the need to answer back since I knew I had won the arguement when you started swearing, a sure sign of someone with nothing new or constructive to say.
You think that swearing is a sign that one is losing or winning an arguement?
Excuse me but...
Thanks for proving you're nothing but a fucking tool.
I was right the first time, you don't even rate.
I will answer this one. When you feel the need to swear in an arguement, then yes, you have indeed already lost. Swearing is a sure sign of a weak mind in a loosing situation. There are times when it might be useful to swear in an arguement, but when you use the term "fucking tool" to try, unsuccesfully BTW, to disparage the other side of an arguement then you must have run out of valid points to try and make.
EyeBrock @ Sat Jan 14, 2006 4:54 pm
You are right Dim this is really boring. I shall cease my gloating over this poor misguided chap who knows very little and is prone to being very wrong.
Ruserious, say hi when you drive to Halton to vote so as you cancel out my vote.
Or is that just wrong of you again?
PS make sure you are talking about historical figures you knew when they were alive as apparently and according to the learned ruserious, one cannot comment on dead historical figures as you won't have been able to assess them first hand.
You and Trudeau were good chums I take it? BBQ's at his house and all that good stuff? Or are you just wrong again?
Ruserious @ Sat Jan 14, 2006 4:58 pm
Wullu Wullu:
Ruserious Ruserious:
Wullu Wullu:
Ruserious Ruserious:
Wullu Wullu:
Well EyeBrock
That it is just Ruserious's way of refusing to admit to defeat. When he starts swearing and calling folks all sorts of not very inventive names he knows he is loosing an arguement. He tried in vane to cuss me out a week or so ago, but after being a miner for 5 years and a sailor for 15 his vocabulary just was not up to the task nothing new there at all
I tried to outcuss you? $1:
Jackass eh? Tut tut. Not a very English expression old bean
That it is just Ruserious's way of refusing to admit to defeat. When he starts swearing and calling folks all sorts of not very inventive names he knows he is loosing an arguement. He tried in vane to cuss me out a week or so ago, but after being a miner for 5 years and a sailor for 15 his vocabulary just was not up to the task
nothing new there at allSorry wullu, you're giving yourself way too much credit.
You don't even rate.
So soon they forget, and at least I had the common courtesy to spell yer name correctly
And you did not try to out cuss me. I was winning and argument ( forget which now...) so you started off yer rant with a string of colourful language. I did not feel the need to answer back since I knew I had won the arguement when you started swearing, a sure sign of someone with nothing new or constructive to say.
You think that swearing is a sign that one is losing or winning an arguement?
Excuse me but...
Thanks for proving you're nothing but a fucking tool.
I was right the first time, you don't even rate.
I will answer this one. When you feel the need to swear in an arguement, then yes, you have indeed already lost. Swearing is a sure sign of a weak mind in a loosing situation. There are times when it might be useful to swear in an arguement, but when you use the term "fucking tool" to try, unsuccesfully BTW, to disparage the other side of an arguement then you must have run out of valid points to try and make.
You and EyeBrock make a good pair Wullu.
Try not to spoon each other all over the board mmkay?
EyeBrock @ Sat Jan 14, 2006 5:02 pm
Oh you are a wag ruserious! A wrong wag but a wag never the less!
Bless you!
OnTheIce @ Sat Jan 14, 2006 5:03 pm
Intelligence and Ruserious don't mix too well. Swearing to get his point across shows he's a tad on the insecure side. Perhaps he's compensating for something.
He's never wrong.
Wullu @ Sat Jan 14, 2006 5:03 pm
Has Unserious said anything even resemebling a rebuttal to my statements, besides continued personal attacks since I waded in here? Thought not.
EyeBrock @ Sat Jan 14, 2006 5:06 pm
Don't wait Wullu, he'll just call you a few more names then say its all a "con" plot. He really doesn't deserve intelligent debate.
Let's just slag him off all the time instead! Woo hoo!
Ruserious @ Sat Jan 14, 2006 5:16 pm
OnTheIce OnTheIce:
Intelligence and Ruserious don't mix too well. Swearing to get his point across shows he's a tad on the insecure side. Perhaps he's compensating for something.
He's never wrong.
OTI, you'll have to take a number, my nutsack's only got room for 2 riders at a time.
He's never wrong.
Ruserious @ Sat Jan 14, 2006 5:19 pm
Wullu Wullu:
Has Unserious said anything even resemebling a rebuttal to my statements, besides continued personal attacks since I waded in here? Thought not.
Which statements would you be referring to Wullu?
The horseshit that you think that by using profanity someone is allegedly losing an arguement?
Help a guy out here... it's not easy to find anything resenbling an arguement of merit that you've posted here.
Yank-in-NY @ Sat Jan 14, 2006 5:21 pm
This thread seems to be a "tad" off topic 
OnTheIce @ Sat Jan 14, 2006 5:21 pm
Ruserious Ruserious:
OnTheIce OnTheIce:
Intelligence and Ruserious don't mix too well. Swearing to get his point across shows he's a tad on the insecure side. Perhaps he's compensating for something.
He's never wrong.
OTI, you'll have to take a number, my nutsack's only got room for 2 riders at a time.He's never wrong.
Point proven. Thank-you.
Previous 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 15 Next