Canada Kicks Ass
Have You Seen the Anti-Abortion Ad featuring...Barack Obama?

REPLY

Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next



djakeydd @ Wed Feb 25, 2009 4:04 pm

Gee, Obomba may have a hard time with a comeback for that - the truth hurts. I am sure tho that he will come out with a way of declaring that sort of ad hate speech and while he's at it maybe he can sentence the ppl who produced it to the death penalty, that'll learn em. Personally, I'm still waiting for him to produce a live certificate of birth for himself so we can find out if Barry Sotero (aka obomba) is a u.s. citizen. Not that it matters, the u.s. constitution is outdated.

   



ShintoMale @ Thu Feb 26, 2009 8:10 am

are these same pro-lifers that create the ad against contraception?

   



romanP @ Thu Feb 26, 2009 9:46 am

Tricks Tricks:
Cannibals handle our protein just fine. What about them?


Which cannibals would those be?

   



DerbyX @ Thu Feb 26, 2009 9:50 am

Kuru

Aside from the obvious cultural taboos and general ickiness of it there is indeed a biological reason not to eat our fellow humans.

   



Tricks @ Thu Feb 26, 2009 9:56 am

romanP romanP:
Tricks Tricks:
Cannibals handle our protein just fine. What about them?


Which cannibals would those be?

Jeffery Dahmer for one. If I'm not mistaken, it's only if certain parts are eaten, such as the brain.

Wow, I really have to stop thinking about this... I just ate...

   



DerbyX @ Thu Feb 26, 2009 9:58 am

Tricks Tricks:
romanP romanP:
Tricks Tricks:
Cannibals handle our protein just fine. What about them?


Which cannibals would those be?

Jeffery Dahmer for one. If I'm not mistaken, it's only if certain parts are eaten, such as the brain.

Wow, I really have to stop thinking about this... I just ate...


Anybody we know? :P

   



CanadianJeff @ Fri Feb 27, 2009 1:54 am

romanP romanP:
CanadianJeff CanadianJeff:
well you know no matter how heated the debate ever gets I find people all agree on one thing. It is totally and utterly wrong for a man to run away from a pregnant woman after he gets her pregnant. I'd love to see our politicians put a law in place that makes men more legally bound to a woman if they get that woman pregnant. Running out on a woman after you knocked her up in my mind puts you as total and utter scum.


I think such a law would be an incredibly bad idea, unless you're talking about child support payments. Forcing a guy that runs away to take care of a child he doesn't want may sound noble in your mind, but it opens up the potential for abuse. Many of those men would probably make horrible fathers anyway.


I'm mostly talking about hard line jail terms if you impregnate a woman and then run off without giving any child support or support of any kind. It should be illegal to "knock up" a woman and then take off. I don't disagree these men will likely be bad fathers but in general men that take on this kind of behavior tend to be bad people in general.

   



Bacardi4206 @ Fri Feb 27, 2009 2:30 am

When they do abortions, the egg is not alive. Meaning once a abortion is done there isn't a life to be killed because the process hasn't happened yet. Nobody does abortions after a certon time limit.

Majority of kids who grow up in a shitty place usually carry that with them. Kids who have to endure stress, depression and shitty lives at a early stage CAN become the first black president yes but that doesn't mean every single one of them is happy. Majority of kids who enter that world don't come out of it.

Kids who get molested generally become molesters themselves when there older. Kids who are depressed develope anger issues and become school bullies and thugs and gangsters. People who grow up in a poor neighbourhood where they cannot even afford school have to steal to make a living.

I mean the list can go on and on. The lucky ones are usually those who find activities to occupy themselves like hockey.

I am not saying that abortion should be used in every scenario but what's the point in giving life if that life is just going to end up in a misserable life and fucked up? If a teenager or other parent doesn't want to keep there kid or can't afford to. If abortion was illegal the only other option would be to have it and put it up for adoption where he or she will be miss-handled, beat up, molested, etc.

The only good adoption places really are the catholic or christian ones. The majority of the rest are underfunded and pretty much take anybody as staff.
Kids at those places really suffer.

Abortion is a choice. If the child is not even considered life yet than there is no rights to life because what isn't alive isn't life. In that time period it's up to the situation of the parents if that kid should be aborted or not.

   



CanadianJeff @ Fri Feb 27, 2009 6:47 pm

$1:
When they do abortions, the egg is not alive.
$1:

False science wise the egg is perfectly alive and is it's own unique organism with it's own DNA that is currently growing to meet that genetic pattern. The only debate is philosophical.

$1:
Nobody does abortions after a certon time limit.


Again false. Plenty of states will NOT preform abortions in the second and third trimester. Some abortion doctors have these same practices of not preforming abortions past a certain point.

$1:
Majority of kids who grow up in a shitty place usually carry that with them. Kids who have to endure stress, depression and shitty lives at a early stage CAN become the first black president yes but that doesn't mean every single one of them is happy. Majority of kids who enter that world don't come out of it.


This is no excuse for us to simply assume one thing or another. Those children are still alive and if we consider depression during childhood an acceptable marker to end that child's life then you would be killing a LOT of teens and younger kids that DO grow out of the phase. I myself was one of them when I was a teen. It's not uncommon for teens to entertain ideas of suicide during stressful points in their lives.

$1:
I am not saying that abortion should be used in every scenario but what's the point in giving life if that life is just going to end up in a misserable life and fucked up? If a teenager or other parent doesn't want to keep there kid or can't afford to. If abortion was illegal the only other option would be to have it and put it up for adoption where he or she will be miss-handled, beat up, molested, etc.


The point is that we have no right to assume we know how a child's life will turn out and that this is simply not the case for the vast majority of abortions.

$1:
Abortion is a choice. If the child is not even considered life yet than there is no rights to life because what isn't alive isn't life. In that time period it's up to the situation of the parents if that kid should be aborted or not.


The child is a unique genetic life form from the moment of it's conception and having sex with someone means that you are consenting to the possibility however low or high of having a child with that person. It's why I am extremely anti-one night stand. You just never know when a condom will fail or if that girl really has been taking her pill properly on time every day.

All in all we need to stop trying to label every single unborn baby that's aborted as some sort of "poverty destined failure" and start realizing that ANY of us here could have been aborted. We don't even know the child's gender in some cases and we think we have any right to say that "this child's life will be shit". We need to shut up and realize these babies are just like you me and any guy down the block.

edit: for some odd reason the forum is glitching and putting extra HTML quote tags in the post that I can't erase forgive the format.

   



DerbyX @ Fri Feb 27, 2009 7:20 pm

They don't. The vast majority of pro-choicers argue on just that basis, choice. I've not met one pro-choicer who has argued that poor people should get more abortions as its more likely their children will suffer needlessly.

The key issue is choice and having sex is simply not both parties signing an agreement over pregnancy. Sex for some 99.9% of the time is done for recreation and not procreation. Of course that doesn't cover rape at all but rape case abortions are a small minority of abortions.

   



CanadianJeff @ Fri Feb 27, 2009 7:24 pm

You can have sex for pleasure all you like but you can NEVER escape the reality that if you have sex with someone they could become pregnant. People need to take responsibility for that. Abortion is an easy way out and the victim will never have to say a word.

People NEED to start taking responsibility for their actions. That and our society needs to stop putting sex in the glory without cost light.

   



DerbyX @ Fri Feb 27, 2009 7:30 pm

CanadianJeff CanadianJeff:
You can have sex for pleasure all you like but you can NEVER escape the reality that if you have sex with someone they could become pregnant. People need to take responsibility for that. Abortion is an easy way out and the victim will never have to say a word.

People NEED to start taking responsibility for their actions. That and our society needs to stop putting sex in the glory without cost light.


Women do accept the responsibility. Its their body and their responsibility just as it is their choice.

Should they decide not to carry a fetus to term then they can get an abortion.

They understand responsibility because they undergo the procedure.

You seem to have little sympathy for even those who take precautions only to have them fail.

Quite frankly you are sounding extremely Victorian in your view on sex.

   



Brenda @ Fri Feb 27, 2009 7:31 pm

DerbyX DerbyX:
Tricks Tricks:
romanP romanP:

Which cannibals would those be?

Jeffery Dahmer for one. If I'm not mistaken, it's only if certain parts are eaten, such as the brain.

Wow, I really have to stop thinking about this... I just ate...


Anybody we know? :P

ROTFL ROTFL ROTFL

   



CanadianJeff @ Fri Feb 27, 2009 7:39 pm

"You seem to have little sympathy for even those who take precautions only to have them fail.

Quite frankly you are sounding extremely Victorian in your view on sex."

I would be far more sympathetic if id didn't result in the murder of an innocent person. Men need to start being held accountable for what they do as well. It's wrong to shove all the responsibility on the women out there.

But I repeat that people need to realize that if you have sex with someone you better be fully open to the possibility of having a child with that person. It could happen and it's a huge life changing event.

   



DerbyX @ Fri Feb 27, 2009 7:47 pm

CanadianJeff CanadianJeff:
"You seem to have little sympathy for even those who take precautions only to have them fail.

Quite frankly you are sounding extremely Victorian in your view on sex."

I would be far more sympathetic if id didn't result in the murder of an innocent person. Men need to start being held accountable for what they do as well. It's wrong to shove all the responsibility on the women out there.

But I repeat that people need to realize that if you have sex with someone you better be fully open to the possibility of having a child with that person. It could happen and it's a huge life changing event.


Its not a person until it can exist outside of the womb. Men do need to take responsibility and quite frankly most do. The dead beat dad scenario is far from accurate. Many fathers do indeed try their best to step up to the plate only to see courts award unfair judgements against them allowing the women to sit at home while he works 16 hour shifts providing for her as he lives in a shanty bachelor pad.

What about the women who get pregnant on purpose?

Lot of what abouts.

Only one truly matters. As long as its a womens body she remains the sole decision maker for that body and if she doesn't want to spend 9 months of her life giving birth in an act that can actually lower her own life expectancy or kill her outright (women still die in childbirth) then nobody on earth deserves the right to force her.

Her body, her choice. No other belief can be supported.

   



REPLY

Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next