BC Parents Will Have to Lie to Keep Kids out of Gay Advocacy
Previous 1 ... 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ... 28 Next
Tricks @ Wed Sep 20, 2006 4:14 pm
Ok seriously Jaime, meet kettle. We get the point already.
Jaime_Souviens @ Thu Sep 21, 2006 5:15 pm
Apparently Old Ms. Lil isn't going to come out and play.
I can't make her respond, and I can't make her retract her bogus insults.
You can lead a horse to water, but you can make it think.
Anyway, I hope when she falsely accuses other members of eugenics, or perhaps mass murder, or genocide, whatever, that none of the rest of you worry about it too much. It seems to just be something she does.
And I am actually disappointed that she couldn't face this head on.
And for old time's sake :
Jaime_Souviens @ Thu Sep 21, 2006 5:15 pm
lily is a liar.
lily does not have the character to admit when she is wrong.
Zipperfish @ Thu Sep 21, 2006 5:18 pm
You're not exactly living up to your Master Debator standing on this thread Jaime. Best to crack a cold one, contemplate the wonders of the cosmos and let it go.
Scrappy @ Thu Sep 21, 2006 5:21 pm
LOL Jamie, you crack me up.
USCAdad, I agree one hundred percent with you.
Gay use to mean, I'm half Scots, happy out going and or a Bonny Lass. So another word is taken from our language to be owned by a special interest group. Lovely. I read that the Gay Society of Torona or god knows whom is sueing someone over the use of the word Pride, they feel that it is an exclusive word owned by the Gay Rights Movement. I hope they don't come after me for using it being a proud and prideful Canadian and all.
Jaime_Souviens @ Thu Sep 21, 2006 5:43 pm
Zipperfish Zipperfish:
You're not exactly living up to your Master Debator standing on this thread Jaime. Best to crack a cold one, contemplate the wonders of the cosmos and let it go.
Did you even read my last post, or did you just decide to come in with guns firing regardless?
Jaime_Souviens @ Thu Sep 21, 2006 5:44 pm
Scrappy Scrappy:
LOL Jamie, you crack me up.
USCAdad, I agree one hundred percent with you.
Gay use to mean, I'm half Scots, happy out going and or a Bonny Lass. So another word is taken from our language to be owned by a special interest group. Lovely. I read that the Gay Society of Torona or god knows whom is sueing someone over the use of the word Pride, they feel that it is an exclusive word owned by the Gay Rights Movement. I hope they don't come after me for using it being a proud and prideful Canadian and all.
USCAdad, I agree one hundred percent with you.
Gay use to mean, I'm half Scots, happy out going and or a Bonny Lass. So another word is taken from our language to be owned by a special interest group. Lovely. I read that the Gay Society of Torona or god knows whom is sueing someone over the use of the word Pride, they feel that it is an exclusive word owned by the Gay Rights Movement. I hope they don't come after me for using it being a proud and prideful Canadian and all.
Well, I'm gay and I'm queer, but I'm not gay and I'm not queer.
Scrappy @ Thu Sep 21, 2006 5:49 pm
Thats okay Jamie, I'm "Gay" and "Odd" and I now know where you are coming from battle on and fight the good fight. 
grainfedprairieboy @ Thu Sep 21, 2006 6:06 pm
So gays will be able to cured (http://www.narth.com/).
Failing drugs or therapy genetics will solve the problem. I believe the late 20th and early 21st centuries are the height of homosexuality and sometime in the next 20 years making sure the homo gene is not present will be standard for any new parents.
Hardy @ Thu Sep 21, 2006 6:22 pm
grainfedprairieboy grainfedprairieboy:
So gays will be able to cured (http://www.narth.com/).
Failing drugs or therapy genetics will solve the problem. I believe the late 20th and early 21st centuries are the height of homosexuality and sometime in the next 20 years making sure the homo gene is not present will be standard for any new parents.
Failing drugs or therapy genetics will solve the problem. I believe the late 20th and early 21st centuries are the height of homosexuality and sometime in the next 20 years making sure the homo gene is not present will be standard for any new parents.
Hey, as long as we're talking about Nazi-like eugenics programs, why not eliminate the religious genes, too? Gays only have annoying parades, while religion has caused thousands of years of war.
$1:
Genes may help determine how religious a person is, suggests a new study of US twins. And the effects of a religious upbringing may fade with time.
Until about 25 years ago, scientists assumed that religious behaviour was simply the product of a person's socialisation - or "nurture". But more recent studies, including those on adult twins who were raised apart, suggest genes contribute about 40% of the variability in a person's religiousness.
But it is not clear how that contribution changes with age. A few studies on children and teenagers - with biological or adoptive parents - show the children tend to mirror the religious beliefs and behaviours of the parents with whom they live. That suggests genes play a small role in religiousness at that age.
Now, researchers led by Laura Koenig, a psychology graduate student at the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis, US, have tried to tease apart how the effects of nature and nurture vary with time. Their study suggests that as adolescents grow into adults, genetic factors become more important in determining how religious a person is, while environmental factors wane.
The team gave questionnaires to 169 pairs of identical twins - 100% genetically identical - and 104 pairs of fraternal twins - 50% genetically identical - born in Minnesota.
The twins, all male and in their early 30s, were asked how often they currently went to religious services, prayed, and discussed religious teachings. This was compared with when they were growing up and living with their families. Then, each participant answered the same questions regarding their mother, father, and their twin.
The twins believed that when they were younger, all of their family members - including themselves - shared similar religious behaviour. But in adulthood, however, only the identical twins reported maintaining that similarity. In contrast, fraternal twins were about a third less similar than they were as children.
"That would suggest genetic factors are becoming more important and growing up together less important," says team member Matt McGue, a psychologist at the University of Minnesota.
Empty nests
Michael McCullough, a psychologist at the University of Miami in Coral Gables, Florida, US, agrees. "To a great extent, you can't be who you are when you're living under your parents' roof. But once you leave the nest, you can begin to let your own preferences and dispositions shape your behaviour," he told New Scientist.
"Maybe, ultimately, we all decide what we're most comfortable with, and it may have more to do with our own makeup than how we were treated when we were adolescents," says McGue.
Until about 25 years ago, scientists assumed that religious behaviour was simply the product of a person's socialisation - or "nurture". But more recent studies, including those on adult twins who were raised apart, suggest genes contribute about 40% of the variability in a person's religiousness.
But it is not clear how that contribution changes with age. A few studies on children and teenagers - with biological or adoptive parents - show the children tend to mirror the religious beliefs and behaviours of the parents with whom they live. That suggests genes play a small role in religiousness at that age.
Now, researchers led by Laura Koenig, a psychology graduate student at the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis, US, have tried to tease apart how the effects of nature and nurture vary with time. Their study suggests that as adolescents grow into adults, genetic factors become more important in determining how religious a person is, while environmental factors wane.
The team gave questionnaires to 169 pairs of identical twins - 100% genetically identical - and 104 pairs of fraternal twins - 50% genetically identical - born in Minnesota.
The twins, all male and in their early 30s, were asked how often they currently went to religious services, prayed, and discussed religious teachings. This was compared with when they were growing up and living with their families. Then, each participant answered the same questions regarding their mother, father, and their twin.
The twins believed that when they were younger, all of their family members - including themselves - shared similar religious behaviour. But in adulthood, however, only the identical twins reported maintaining that similarity. In contrast, fraternal twins were about a third less similar than they were as children.
"That would suggest genetic factors are becoming more important and growing up together less important," says team member Matt McGue, a psychologist at the University of Minnesota.
Empty nests
Michael McCullough, a psychologist at the University of Miami in Coral Gables, Florida, US, agrees. "To a great extent, you can't be who you are when you're living under your parents' roof. But once you leave the nest, you can begin to let your own preferences and dispositions shape your behaviour," he told New Scientist.
"Maybe, ultimately, we all decide what we're most comfortable with, and it may have more to do with our own makeup than how we were treated when we were adolescents," says McGue.
http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn7147
SireJoe @ Thu Sep 21, 2006 6:31 pm
grainfedprairieboy grainfedprairieboy:
So gays will be able to cured (http://www.narth.com/).
Failing drugs or therapy genetics will solve the problem. I believe the late 20th and early 21st centuries are the height of homosexuality and sometime in the next 20 years making sure the homo gene is not present will be standard for any new parents.
Failing drugs or therapy genetics will solve the problem. I believe the late 20th and early 21st centuries are the height of homosexuality and sometime in the next 20 years making sure the homo gene is not present will be standard for any new parents.
My fucking God. This is the people you put yourself inline with Jaime? What the fuck. You are one big piece of shit there grainy. Hopefully we can cure the CON gene sometime soon. No, I take that back, I will NEVER put all cons in the same boat as a POS like you. Fucking bigots like yourself need to be locked up so that your mental state cannot hurt anymore people.
Homosexuality is at its fucking height? Are you that dumb buddy? Shall we go back to the greek era? Why dont you take a fucking clue and learn something about history, something about humanity before you spout off to some ludicris right wing website stating the "ability to cure homosexuality".
How many people hold the same opinion as this fuck nut? I sure as well hope there isnt to many. Welcome to the Nazi class Grainy. Have fun.
grainfedprairieboy @ Thu Sep 21, 2006 6:32 pm
hey Hardy, have you noticed that the more polluted the world becomes, the more crowded the cities are, that there is more cancers, gays and lieberals?
Jaime_Souviens @ Thu Sep 21, 2006 6:33 pm
Hardy Hardy:
grainfedprairieboy grainfedprairieboy:
So gays will be able to cured (http://www.narth.com/).
Failing drugs or therapy genetics will solve the problem. I believe the late 20th and early 21st centuries are the height of homosexuality and sometime in the next 20 years making sure the homo gene is not present will be standard for any new parents.
Failing drugs or therapy genetics will solve the problem. I believe the late 20th and early 21st centuries are the height of homosexuality and sometime in the next 20 years making sure the homo gene is not present will be standard for any new parents.
Hey, as long as we're talking about Nazi-like eugenics programs, why not eliminate the religious genes, too? Gays only have annoying parades, while religion has caused thousands of years of war.
$1:
Genes may help determine how religious a person is, suggests a new study of US twins. And the effects of a religious upbringing may fade with time.
Until about 25 years ago, scientists assumed that religious behaviour was simply the product of a person's socialisation - or "nurture". But more recent studies, including those on adult twins who were raised apart, suggest genes contribute about 40% of the variability in a person's religiousness.
But it is not clear how that contribution changes with age. A few studies on children and teenagers - with biological or adoptive parents - show the children tend to mirror the religious beliefs and behaviours of the parents with whom they live. That suggests genes play a small role in religiousness at that age.
Now, researchers led by Laura Koenig, a psychology graduate student at the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis, US, have tried to tease apart how the effects of nature and nurture vary with time. Their study suggests that as adolescents grow into adults, genetic factors become more important in determining how religious a person is, while environmental factors wane.
The team gave questionnaires to 169 pairs of identical twins - 100% genetically identical - and 104 pairs of fraternal twins - 50% genetically identical - born in Minnesota.
The twins, all male and in their early 30s, were asked how often they currently went to religious services, prayed, and discussed religious teachings. This was compared with when they were growing up and living with their families. Then, each participant answered the same questions regarding their mother, father, and their twin.
The twins believed that when they were younger, all of their family members - including themselves - shared similar religious behaviour. But in adulthood, however, only the identical twins reported maintaining that similarity. In contrast, fraternal twins were about a third less similar than they were as children.
"That would suggest genetic factors are becoming more important and growing up together less important," says team member Matt McGue, a psychologist at the University of Minnesota.
Empty nests
Michael McCullough, a psychologist at the University of Miami in Coral Gables, Florida, US, agrees. "To a great extent, you can't be who you are when you're living under your parents' roof. But once you leave the nest, you can begin to let your own preferences and dispositions shape your behaviour," he told New Scientist.
"Maybe, ultimately, we all decide what we're most comfortable with, and it may have more to do with our own makeup than how we were treated when we were adolescents," says McGue.
Until about 25 years ago, scientists assumed that religious behaviour was simply the product of a person's socialisation - or "nurture". But more recent studies, including those on adult twins who were raised apart, suggest genes contribute about 40% of the variability in a person's religiousness.
But it is not clear how that contribution changes with age. A few studies on children and teenagers - with biological or adoptive parents - show the children tend to mirror the religious beliefs and behaviours of the parents with whom they live. That suggests genes play a small role in religiousness at that age.
Now, researchers led by Laura Koenig, a psychology graduate student at the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis, US, have tried to tease apart how the effects of nature and nurture vary with time. Their study suggests that as adolescents grow into adults, genetic factors become more important in determining how religious a person is, while environmental factors wane.
The team gave questionnaires to 169 pairs of identical twins - 100% genetically identical - and 104 pairs of fraternal twins - 50% genetically identical - born in Minnesota.
The twins, all male and in their early 30s, were asked how often they currently went to religious services, prayed, and discussed religious teachings. This was compared with when they were growing up and living with their families. Then, each participant answered the same questions regarding their mother, father, and their twin.
The twins believed that when they were younger, all of their family members - including themselves - shared similar religious behaviour. But in adulthood, however, only the identical twins reported maintaining that similarity. In contrast, fraternal twins were about a third less similar than they were as children.
"That would suggest genetic factors are becoming more important and growing up together less important," says team member Matt McGue, a psychologist at the University of Minnesota.
Empty nests
Michael McCullough, a psychologist at the University of Miami in Coral Gables, Florida, US, agrees. "To a great extent, you can't be who you are when you're living under your parents' roof. But once you leave the nest, you can begin to let your own preferences and dispositions shape your behaviour," he told New Scientist.
"Maybe, ultimately, we all decide what we're most comfortable with, and it may have more to do with our own makeup than how we were treated when we were adolescents," says McGue.
http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn7147
Boooooorrnnn to be Baaa ---aa---aapp-tist.
Zipperfish @ Thu Sep 21, 2006 6:37 pm
grainfedprairieboy grainfedprairieboy:
hey Hardy, have you noticed that the more polluted the world becomes, the more crowded the cities are, that there is more cancers, gays and lieberals?
Sign up wiht the Taliban. No gays there. Nothing but moral purity.
grainfedprairieboy @ Thu Sep 21, 2006 6:38 pm
S'funny. Maybe if I had said that in 20 years we would be able to select eye colour I'd have been ignored. But to dare suggest that parents may one day be allowed to decide if their kid is gay or not...well then the horror, the horror.
Too bad Sirejoe, one day you'll be in the old gays home watching vintage gay porn with no new generation to follow you.
Previous 1 ... 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ... 28 Next