Letter from Liberal Party on Montana death-row Canadian
novachick @ Tue Dec 04, 2007 4:41 am
My bad, sorry for freaking out 
Delwin @ Tue Dec 04, 2007 6:01 am
Conservatives are walking talking contradictions.
They supposedly want less power for the state and more for the individual, but they want to give the state the right to their lives.
They supposedly want lower taxes, but spend more on wars then any Liberal could spend on social programs. They always end up running a deficit.
They run around preaching about Jesus and act in the exact opposite way that Jesus would have acted.
No wonder they are so angry and up tight all of the time, there is a lot of inner conflict to deal with for
these people.
tritium @ Tue Dec 04, 2007 10:38 am
Liberals :
Preach about saving the enviorment, but all those Liberal soccer mom's with 7 kids drive around big SUVs.
For liberals, Jews are just so “last Holocaust.”
The reason Liberals created the anti-discriminatory platform, is because they are afraid. They are afraid of criticism, success, failure, lack of popularity, and pretty much everything in general, AND "Misery Loves Company".
..
Brenda @ Tue Dec 04, 2007 11:17 am
lily lily:
Liberals are soccer moms with 7 kids?
Where did you put your other 5, Lily?
tritium @ Tue Dec 04, 2007 11:20 am
lily lily:
Liberals are soccer moms with 7 kids?
YES!!! Liberals are Volvo & SUV-Driving Humorless Soccer Moms.
...and conservatives are Dodge Ram driving southern good-old boys.
and questions.
Yogi @ Tue Dec 04, 2007 11:26 am
[
...and conservatives are Dodge Ram driving southern good-old boys.
]
Brenda @ Tue Dec 04, 2007 11:30 am
lily lily:
No-one's supposed to know about them. 
I thought that was an odd comment, since it's generally understood that the Cons are the family values party while us Libs are selfishly having fewer kids... if we're having them at all.
I thought that was an odd comment, since it's generally understood that the Cons are the family values party while us Libs are selfishly having fewer kids... if we're having them at all.
That's what I thought to...
Libs are only aborting their kids, because these kids don't fit in the lifes at the moment... And the Cons don't know how to use condoms and cannot be on the pill because the Pope says so
tritium @ Tue Dec 04, 2007 11:30 am
lily lily:
No-one's supposed to know about them.
I thought that was an odd comment, since it's generally understood that the Cons are the family values party while us Libs are selfishly having fewer kids... if we're having them at all.
I thought that was an odd comment, since it's generally understood that the Cons are the family values party while us Libs are selfishly having fewer kids... if we're having them at all.
No, no. It's the Liberal Feminists that don't have children and want to go out an work. (no need for a man)
...and of course the Liberals advocate abortion so they don't have to take responibility for the life they may have brought into this world.
So I guess you're right Lily, Liberals are not kid friendly.
..
tritium @ Tue Dec 04, 2007 11:33 am
lily lily:
Ok, that's not funny anymore.
Truth hurts.
Brenda @ Tue Dec 04, 2007 11:34 am
You're not taking him seriously, are you?
tritium @ Tue Dec 04, 2007 11:36 am
Brenda Brenda:
You're not taking him seriously, are you?
I hope not Lily. Both my sisters are both die hard Liberal Feminists with families and very good morals. (of course they live in Ontraio) I'm the Red Neck of the my family...
I don't think a lable, Liberal or Conservative means shit.
It's how a person is raised, education and morals that mean everything. NOT POLITICAL ALLEGIANCE!!
Sorry of I offended you Lily, just paying the Liberal card.
Zipperfish @ Tue Dec 04, 2007 11:41 am
I support the Death Penalty on the following condition: In the event that it can be proven that the judiciary wrongfully convicted and executed a man, then the PM, as the ultimate person responsible, must stand trial for premeditated murder (a capital offence). The state should not be able to give itself a "free pass" on murder if it executes a wrongfully convicted person.
Zipperfish @ Tue Dec 04, 2007 11:44 am
tritium tritium:
lily lily:
Ok, that's not funny anymore.
Truth hurts.
No stupidity hurts. Really. You are so stupid, it's painful to read your posts.
hurley_108 @ Tue Dec 04, 2007 11:46 am
Zipperfish Zipperfish:
I support the Death Penalty on the following condition: In the event that it can be proven that the judiciary wrongfully convicted and executed a man, then the PM, as the ultimate person responsible, must stand trial for premeditated murder (a capital offence). The state should not be able to give itself a "free pass" on murder if it executes a wrongfully convicted person.
I could support that. But would it be the PM at time of execution or the PM at time of sentencing?
tritium @ Tue Dec 04, 2007 11:49 am
Zipperfish Zipperfish:
tritium tritium:
lily lily:
Ok, that's not funny anymore.
Truth hurts.
No stupidity hurts. Really. You are so stupid, it's painful to read your posts.
Yes like this one....
Zipperfish Zipperfish:
I support the Death Penalty on the following condition: In the event that it can be proven that the judiciary wrongfully convicted and executed a man, then the PM, as the ultimate person responsible, must stand trial for premeditated murder (a capital offence). The state should not be able to give itself a "free pass" on murder if it executes a wrongfully convicted person.
Intellect takes one step back with this post.
Beyond Reality.