NO MORE AMERICAN BASHING !
Previous 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Rev_Blair @ Sat Oct 01, 2005 11:55 am
It's based on the fact that the US broke international laws by invading Iraq, Tallywhacker.
ziggy @ Sat Oct 01, 2005 12:14 pm
Rev_Blair Rev_Blair:
It's based on the fact that the US broke international laws by invading Iraq, Tallywhacker.
What would you do if the CN tower instead of the twin towers was hit by suicide bombers?
Would you feel different towards the Iraqi's then?
Would it be ok by you to attack them pre emptively?anything sanctioned by an ordained minister must be all good eh??
Would you feel anger towards all the Canadians working in Iraq?
Just curious.
Ripcat @ Sat Oct 01, 2005 12:34 pm
ziggy ziggy:
What would you do if the CN tower instead of the twin towers was hit by suicide bombers?
Would you feel different towards the Iraqi's then?
Would you feel different towards the Iraqi's then?
Hmmmm, did Iraq bomb the World Trade Towers?
Has a definite link between Saddam and Osama been established?
Isn't Canada in Afghanistan helping with the war on terror there?
Just curious.
ziggy @ Sat Oct 01, 2005 2:15 pm
Ripcat Ripcat:
ziggy ziggy:
What would you do if the CN tower instead of the twin towers was hit by suicide bombers?
Would you feel different towards the Iraqi's then?
Would you feel different towards the Iraqi's then?
Hmmmm, did Iraq bomb the World Trade Towers?
Has a definite link between Saddam and Osama been established?
Isn't Canada in Afghanistan helping with the war on terror there?
Just curious.
The only link I can see is religious.Is that good enough?
Or maybe a hatred for the west and our culture,Terrorism seem's to be aimed at western civilization now and the end of it.so far as I can see there will allways be a link between the sadaams and the osama's,who cares which faction did the bombing,you cant just sit back and let it happen without taking some action.I dont agree with the Iraq war but I can understand why the US did what it did even though it seems that most would use it as an excuse to slam the US just to slam them.
Once you can see through the hatred for the US then you can judge the whole war without bias,are you biased mullah Ripcat?
hwacker @ Sat Oct 01, 2005 3:37 pm
Rev_Blair Rev_Blair:
It's based on the fact that the US broke international laws by invading Iraq, Tallywhacker.
Really now, post them please, and I’ll follow it up with the UN resolutions that were broken and what was LEGAL to happen if he didn't comply.
wait for your BS............
Scape @ Sat Oct 01, 2005 4:31 pm
The Bush administration is planning to make the US the first country in history to initiate war with nuclear weapons.
Two preventative nuclear wars, they will be just as illegal.
War is illegal. If China invaded Taiwan after Super typhoon LongWang hits that would be illegal. When Saddam invaded Kuwait, that was illegal. When the US invaded Iraq that was illegal. The excuses for war be they nationalism, greed or hegemony are just that, excuses. War is still an break down of civil order, thus illegal.
hwacker @ Sat Oct 01, 2005 4:38 pm
Scape Scape:
The Bush administration is planning to make the US the first country in history to initiate war with nuclear weapons.
Two preventative nuclear wars, they will be just as illegal.
War is illegal. If China invaded Taiwan after Super typhoon LongWang hits that would be illegal. When Saddam invaded Kuwait, that was illegal. When the US invaded Iraq that was illegal. The excuses for war be they nationalism, greed or hegemony are just that, excuses. War is still an break down of civil order, thus illegal.
Two preventative nuclear wars, they will be just as illegal.
War is illegal. If China invaded Taiwan after Super typhoon LongWang hits that would be illegal. When Saddam invaded Kuwait, that was illegal. When the US invaded Iraq that was illegal. The excuses for war be they nationalism, greed or hegemony are just that, excuses. War is still an break down of civil order, thus illegal.
Well thats not what the UN says, would you like to read the resolutions ?
Jaime_Souviens @ Sat Oct 01, 2005 4:39 pm
Scape Scape:
By the same author :
The Democratic Nazi Party
where he says the American Democratic Party is a new Nazi Party.
ziggy @ Sat Oct 01, 2005 4:49 pm
Jaime_Souviens Jaime_Souviens:
Scape Scape:
By the same author :
The Democratic Nazi Party
where he says the American Democratic Party is a new Nazi Party.
What does that make the Republicans then? Neo-nazi's?
Jaime_Souviens @ Sat Oct 01, 2005 4:51 pm
ziggy ziggy:
Jaime_Souviens Jaime_Souviens:
Scape Scape:
By the same author :
The Democratic Nazi Party
where he says the American Democratic Party is a new Nazi Party.
What does that make the Republicans then? Neo-nazi's?
I have no idea, but the guy seems to be a bit tweaked...
Scape @ Sat Oct 01, 2005 5:09 pm
hwacker hwacker:
Scape Scape:
The Bush administration is planning to make the US the first country in history to initiate war with nuclear weapons.
Two preventative nuclear wars, they will be just as illegal.
War is illegal. If China invaded Taiwan after Super typhoon LongWang hits that would be illegal. When Saddam invaded Kuwait, that was illegal. When the US invaded Iraq that was illegal. The excuses for war be they nationalism, greed or hegemony are just that, excuses. War is still an break down of civil order, thus illegal.
Two preventative nuclear wars, they will be just as illegal.
War is illegal. If China invaded Taiwan after Super typhoon LongWang hits that would be illegal. When Saddam invaded Kuwait, that was illegal. When the US invaded Iraq that was illegal. The excuses for war be they nationalism, greed or hegemony are just that, excuses. War is still an break down of civil order, thus illegal.
Well thats not what the UN says, would you like to read the resolutions ?
You can quote me whatever regulation you'd like. It does not make war legal.
US-Israeli Diplomatic Triumph Over Iran
Article XII. C of the IAEA Statute does say that IAEA "inspectors shall report any non-compliance to the Director General who shall thereupon transmit the report to the Board of Governors. The Board shall call upon the recipient State or States to remedy forthwith any non-compliance which it finds to have occurred. The Board shall report the non-compliance to all members and to the Security Council and General Assembly of the United Nations."
But, if you read that article carefully, you will realize that "non-compliance" in that "context" could mean that IAEA inspectors had discovered that some Iranians who routinely handled "source materials" were not washing their hands, afterwards, as "prescribed by the Agency."
Does that mean it is then legal when Israel use nuclear weapons on Iran? According to this, yes. When we have nukes flying it will be all very legal and we will all end up very dead.
hwacker @ Sat Oct 01, 2005 5:15 pm
Scape Scape:
hwacker hwacker:
Scape Scape:
The Bush administration is planning to make the US the first country in history to initiate war with nuclear weapons.
Two preventative nuclear wars, they will be just as illegal.
War is illegal. If China invaded Taiwan after Super typhoon LongWang hits that would be illegal. When Saddam invaded Kuwait, that was illegal. When the US invaded Iraq that was illegal. The excuses for war be they nationalism, greed or hegemony are just that, excuses. War is still an break down of civil order, thus illegal.
Two preventative nuclear wars, they will be just as illegal.
War is illegal. If China invaded Taiwan after Super typhoon LongWang hits that would be illegal. When Saddam invaded Kuwait, that was illegal. When the US invaded Iraq that was illegal. The excuses for war be they nationalism, greed or hegemony are just that, excuses. War is still an break down of civil order, thus illegal.
Well thats not what the UN says, would you like to read the resolutions ?
You can quote me whatever regulation you'd like. It does not make war legal.
US-Israeli Diplomatic Triumph Over Iran
Article XII. C of the IAEA Statute does say that IAEA "inspectors shall report any non-compliance to the Director General who shall thereupon transmit the report to the Board of Governors. The Board shall call upon the recipient State or States to remedy forthwith any non-compliance which it finds to have occurred. The Board shall report the non-compliance to all members and to the Security Council and General Assembly of the United Nations."
But, if you read that article carefully, you will realize that "non-compliance" in that "context" could mean that IAEA inspectors had discovered that some Iranians who routinely handled "source materials" were not washing their hands, afterwards, as "prescribed by the Agency."
Does that mean it is then legal when Israel use nuclear weapons on Iran? According to this, yes. When we have nukes flying it will be all very legal and we will all end up very dead.
Na the only one that will land on Canada is the one at Paul Martins house, just stay clear of that place and you'll be fine.
Scape @ Sat Oct 01, 2005 5:30 pm
Israel will take out Iran's nuke facilities if US does not
$1:
Washington, Sep 30 (PTI) If Washington and its allies do not stop Iran's nuclear programmes by force if necessary, Israel will, three Israeli legislators visiting the US have warned.
"Israel will not live under the threat of an Iranian nuclear bomb. We feel we are obliged to warn our friends that Israel should not be pushed into a situation where we see no other solution but to act unilaterally against Iran," said Yosef Lapid, head of the Shinui Party.
Lapid and his colleagues Yuval Steinitz, chairman of the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defence Committee and Arieh Eldad, a member of the Israeli National Union Party said conventional diplomacy will not work with Iran. "They won't be stopped unless they are convinced their programmes will be destroyed if they continue," they said.
Steinitz said Israeli officials estimate Tehran is only two to three years away from developing a nucelar bomb and that time is running out for the world to act.
"We see an Iranian bomb as a devastating existential threat to Israel, to the entire Middle East, to all Western interests in the region," he said.
"For us, either the world will tackle Iran in advance or all of us will face the consequences."
Eldad said Israelis across the political spectrum see Iran as the most serious threat to Israel, one that cannot be ignored." Eldad conceded that there could be problems if Israel acted. "If we have to do it, we will do it. If the United States and the world community do it, there is a chance the issue can be contained. If Israel has to do it alone, there is no chance the conflict can be contained."
"Israel will not live under the threat of an Iranian nuclear bomb. We feel we are obliged to warn our friends that Israel should not be pushed into a situation where we see no other solution but to act unilaterally against Iran," said Yosef Lapid, head of the Shinui Party.
Lapid and his colleagues Yuval Steinitz, chairman of the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defence Committee and Arieh Eldad, a member of the Israeli National Union Party said conventional diplomacy will not work with Iran. "They won't be stopped unless they are convinced their programmes will be destroyed if they continue," they said.
Steinitz said Israeli officials estimate Tehran is only two to three years away from developing a nucelar bomb and that time is running out for the world to act.
"We see an Iranian bomb as a devastating existential threat to Israel, to the entire Middle East, to all Western interests in the region," he said.
"For us, either the world will tackle Iran in advance or all of us will face the consequences."
Eldad said Israelis across the political spectrum see Iran as the most serious threat to Israel, one that cannot be ignored." Eldad conceded that there could be problems if Israel acted. "If we have to do it, we will do it. If the United States and the world community do it, there is a chance the issue can be contained. If Israel has to do it alone, there is no chance the conflict can be contained."
5 Russian Warships, Sub Moved Next To Iran/India
Russia to supply Syria with ammunition, train officers
Canadian_Mind @ Sat Oct 01, 2005 5:44 pm
hwacker hwacker:
Scape Scape:
hwacker hwacker:
Scape Scape:
The Bush administration is planning to make the US the first country in history to initiate war with nuclear weapons.
Two preventative nuclear wars, they will be just as illegal.
War is illegal. If China invaded Taiwan after Super typhoon LongWang hits that would be illegal. When Saddam invaded Kuwait, that was illegal. When the US invaded Iraq that was illegal. The excuses for war be they nationalism, greed or hegemony are just that, excuses. War is still an break down of civil order, thus illegal.
Two preventative nuclear wars, they will be just as illegal.
War is illegal. If China invaded Taiwan after Super typhoon LongWang hits that would be illegal. When Saddam invaded Kuwait, that was illegal. When the US invaded Iraq that was illegal. The excuses for war be they nationalism, greed or hegemony are just that, excuses. War is still an break down of civil order, thus illegal.
Well thats not what the UN says, would you like to read the resolutions ?
You can quote me whatever regulation you'd like. It does not make war legal.
US-Israeli Diplomatic Triumph Over Iran
Article XII. C of the IAEA Statute does say that IAEA "inspectors shall report any non-compliance to the Director General who shall thereupon transmit the report to the Board of Governors. The Board shall call upon the recipient State or States to remedy forthwith any non-compliance which it finds to have occurred. The Board shall report the non-compliance to all members and to the Security Council and General Assembly of the United Nations."
But, if you read that article carefully, you will realize that "non-compliance" in that "context" could mean that IAEA inspectors had discovered that some Iranians who routinely handled "source materials" were not washing their hands, afterwards, as "prescribed by the Agency."
Does that mean it is then legal when Israel use nuclear weapons on Iran? According to this, yes. When we have nukes flying it will be all very legal and we will all end up very dead.
Na the only one that will land on Canada is the one at Paul Martins house, just stay clear of that place and you'll be fine.
well thats still half a million canucks dead in an instant. tht area is really crowded and there is no way we could evacuate it. and it doesn't take a crazy person to point out that bush wants to go nuke. he's accusing everyones of using nukes, so him firing first would be "preventaitive action." I just hope it don't happen. I don't think china and russia and south korea will be to happy about nukes going off on their doorsteps.
Joe_Stalin @ Sat Oct 01, 2005 5:45 pm
Who decides when a war is legal? Surely not the band of bandits at the UN.
The two crooked nations who traded with Saddam despite UN sanctions France and Germany?
When was the last "Legal" war? Vietnam was a police action.
The 40 year war of Muslims killing Christians in the Sudan?
Previous 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next