Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6 ... 13  Next

Actually, I accidently did a double post, so I decided to take the second post and write something else that I wanted to say in it.....

All caps, you must really be pissed. Haha, too bad it was just a double post which I've seen you accidently do before....

   

I'm pissed becasue you ALWAYS DO IT!!!!!!!!

   

Is there supposed to be humor and/or satire buried somewhere in that drivel?

   

Hmm, well maybe you should calm down. I don't see how it hurts anybody....

Anyways, you're a dictator AdamNF, and you have already tried to say that certain post should be closed because you don't agree with them, and now you are getting pissed because I don't post like you. You always get pissed because I have different opinions than you and when I say something you don't agree with, you call me stupid. I don't get pissed though.....

I can't really get pissed at you, because I understand the will to power. Everyone has the will to power, and your will to power is to try and make the world fit your view of it, which is why when you don't agree with my view, you cut me down and say yours is the best, because you can't see beyond your view. I have thought out your view, and I have a book about the pros and cons of certain debate issues, so when you tell me what you believe, I look up that book and usually find the opposite of what you say....

The book is called pros and cons, I got it at amazon. I like to listen to other peoples points of view, but if you are going to go off getting pissed at the way I post, and calling me stupid cause you don't agree with me, then I don't see what the point is of you even bothering with me. If you are so smart, you would ignore me, but instead you want to mold me to fit into your world, because you have a fixed point of view of the world, it seems....

   

Yep, I was just trying to show how it isn't right to classify someone as something, like how that one guy was making jokes about people being American. Of course, he is entitled to his opinion, but I just wanted to show that it never sounds right when you make jokes about things people can't help, like being born an American....

I think the question should be "is there supposed to be humor and/or satire buried somewhere in YOUR drivel."

I don't feel like being patronised, but go ahead if you will, although I wont respond to it again....

   

I have absolutely no problem poking at celebrities, politicians, governments et al . . . .

Racism, bigotry, prejudice, hate, in all their guises are a different matter.

   

I completely agree. I don't actually think what I wrote, I was just saying the most racist and hateful things that people say as jokes to show how wrong it is to even say stuff about how stupid Americans are, or how fat they are, or how much better Canadians are than them. Saying that Americans are stupid is no better to me than saying that black people are stupid, or that french people smell. Even if it's a joke, it's all the same to me. Now, I know that one guy could say he was making fun of the government, but for him to imply that the US would probably accidently attack Canada chasing commies, he was basically saying that Americans are stupid and don't know anything.

   

Johnybegood....

Your post on weather is a gem, a classic. I am still laughing out loud.

You are telling people that wear T-shirts in -10°C weather that -10°C is not T-shirt weather, and that we are idiots. Just because you have never done it doesn't make it impossible or idiotic dude - happens all the time, just ask us.

Dude, dude, dude. How would a waterfall freeze solid at 34F? How would you drive a truck on a lake at 34F? How do you get 6' of frost in the ground at 34F? Better get a better reference. Check this one out, it may clear things up. Have a look at the extremes also.

http://www.sedsystems.ca/ContactUs/Visi ... /index.php



This is the funniest thing I have ever seen posted on a website devoted to Canadian content. Please elaborate on these top secret tools such as the packets that heat up hands, boots that insulate feet, and certain fabrics that block wind/rain. We call them Hotshots, Sorrel's and Goretex bro, you can buy them all at WalMart.

This part of your post is so funny, in fact, that I am forwarding it to my friends as a classic American quote on Canadian weather and the might of US Army Technology.

m

   

So you are saying that Canada could beat the US in a war? Those temps were the average temperatures which were recorded over the past 50 years. Maybe my source was wrong, but the temps still do not normally get below 0 degrees for Saskatchewan, so this whole "we wear tshirts in -10 degrees" thing seems like bragging yourselves up. Another thing is that I never said that the US had 'top secret' gear, I just said that they can use things which are a part of modern technology. Nice try trying to make me out to look stupid by patronising me. The US army uses those packets and stuff as tools to fight the cold. I live in Canada and I dunno anyone who wears tshirts in cold weather unless they are an idiot. Most people I see wear turtlenecks or sweaters at least. I had a friend in the US who lived accross the street from me who was from Nova Scotia who had to wear a big winter jacket, during the winter, in TEXAS. Water freezes at anything below 32 degrees. The extremes are not the averages, so they don't matter. An extreme once experienced in New York was -52 degrees, but that doesn't mean that is normal. I'm not doubting that Canada gets very cold, but you can shut up with telling me you are going to send my post to your friends, because you blew it up to mean more than it did, and I maybe got one bad source. I never talked about super secret military technology, just that technology for handling the cold has advanced and that cold is not that big of an issue in wars anymore.

The US army does have alot of might behind it's army to, at least alot more than the Canadian army....

   

Canada did help a good deal in world war 2, along with the Brits. The main thing I find laughable is that this site says that Canadians led the invasion of normandy. First off, Canadians and the Brits had it easy at their beaches compared to the beaches the American went to. Have any of you ever seen the series World at War? It's a 20 something episode set, each episode about an hour long and very indepth on everything from the battle of Stalingrad to the normandy invasion. In the World at War set, which shows alot of footage you can't see elsewhere, it shows the beaches which Canada and Britian invaded, and it shows them basically walking on the beaches and they look like they aren't encountering very much resistance. They then show the beaches the Americans went to and it's like an all out war scene with the boats shooting off Cannons and people falling down dieing everywhere. Now, I don't doubt that Canada and the Brits had some tough battles and did their fair share of fighting and were very good at it, but saying that Canada and Britian led the invasion of Normandy, when they had the easy beaches and didn't even have to fight that much at their beaches, is somewhat incorrect. Also, for any of you who are going to be like "oh, the World at War is probably an American set" well it has alot of British speakers and interviews with people from the countries invaded and I actually think there's more Brits that are a part of the special than Americans. Montogomery or however his name is spelled and Patton where almost competing and both doing a very good job leading armies in the war. The Canadians helped out a good deal, but I do think that the Americans and Brits did more, but Canada wasn't that big of a country, so they did alot for how big they were.

   

fgd.

   

Out of the 5 beaches, Juno was the second most well defended beach. So what are you talking about.

   

I dont think he knows!


And for the record, when you have -30 C weather for 2 weeks straight, -10 C feels pretty warm. ( <---From Alberta)

   

i am not sure what ww2 invasions has to do with canada us war.....but the dieppe raid was a massacre of canadians.

i don't think the thing you posted is accurate.

read the whole story here

   

I never meant that throughout the whole war the Americans had it the hardest, just that on D-day the Americans had the hardest beaches, and you can look online and watch world at war(seems to have alot of brits speaking)which will show and tell you that the American beaches on D_day were the most defended and hardest beaches. I never said anything about the previous attempts by British and Canadian forces, and they retreated the first time anyways so I don't see what that has to do with anything. It's funny that you try to argue how much resistance the Canadians and Brits faced when they both retreated because the German resistance was so tough. Of course, there were areas that the Brits and Canadians faced some stiff resistance on the Beaches of D-day, but overall the Americans had it the worst on D-day. I was talking about who had it the hardest on D-day, not who had it hardest the whole war, cause if we went into that I would say the Germans, Russians, and Japanese had it hardest.

   

Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6 ... 13  Next