Conservative Candidate... Charged with Smuggling
Ruserious Ruserious:
Motorcycleboy Motorcycleboy:
While we're on the subject Lily, did you notice what Stephen Harper did today when he got wind of a possible corrupt candidate in his party?
He fired the guy.
Maybe the Liberals could consider doing the same thing.
In Canada.
Yeah. Maybe they could.
I'm serious.
How many Liberal candidates are up on criminal charges MCB?
That's right, none.
I'm sure that the Liberals would do the same thing if one of their candidates were to have actually been charged with committing a criminal offence.
Why do you make it so easy Ruserious?
One CPC candidate, who was fired today, as soon as PM in waiting Stephen Harper found out about it?
Is that the best you can do for a scandal?
Did you notice how quick our clean guy kicked the scandalee loose from the party? Are you going to keep trying to tie Zeisman into the CPC when Harper has clearly said he will not allow the crook to serve as a CPC candidate even if he wins?
Can you say that about Goodale? Can you say that about Sgro? You guys are so full of RCMP investigations, you couldn't cut any of your perps loose without hobbling the government.
Fucking clowns.
Nice attempt at spinning it but you failed to answer the question.
How many of them have been charged with a criminal offence MCB?
797 @ Thu Jan 12, 2006 11:05 pm
$1:
Fucking clowns.
Best post of the day..
Ruserious Ruserious:
Nice attempt at spinning it but you failed to answer the question.
How many of them have been charged with a criminal offence MCB?
Spinning? Not really.
I don't think any of the other candidates are currently facing criminal charges. I suppose if you dug into it, you'd find a few MP's on both side of the fence with a crim charge or two in their background.
But without a doubt, this Zeisman guy is a loser. He's no longer a Conservative. Harper fired him. Regardless of the outcome of the election, he will never sit as a Conservative MP.
What more should we do?
What more should you do?
How about screening your potential MP's backgrounds a bit better for starters.
Maybe then, you wouldn't have clowns like Zeisman representing your party in a federal election.
And you expect Canadians to trust your party to run the government when you can't even perform a proper background check on someone you're entrusting to serve as an MP if elected?
Ruserious Ruserious:
What more should you do?
How about screening your potential MP's backgrounds a bit better for starters.
Maybe then, you wouldn't have clowns like Zeisman representing your party in a federal election.
And you expect Canadians to trust your party to run the government when you can't even perform a proper background check on someone you're entrusting to serve as an MP if elected?
No problem. As soon as you can ensure your
CABINET MINISTERS aren't subject to
CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS, we'll make sure our
CANDIDATES are above reproach.
Until that time, we'll just
FIRE anyone whose integrity comes under suspicion. You guys can keep playing the
"innocent until proven guilty" card till your blue in the face.
And we'll leave judgement on that tactic up to the electorate. Agreed?
Motorcycleboy Motorcycleboy:
Ruserious Ruserious:
What more should you do?
How about screening your potential MP's backgrounds a bit better for starters.
Maybe then, you wouldn't have clowns like Zeisman representing your party in a federal election.
And you expect Canadians to trust your party to run the government when you can't even perform a proper background check on someone you're entrusting to serve as an MP if elected?
No problem. As soon as you can ensure your
CABINET MINISTERS aren't subject to
CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS, we'll make sure our
CANDIDATES are above reproach.
Until that time, we'll just
FIRE anyone whose integrity comes under suspicion. You guys can keep playing the
"innocent until proven guilty" card till your blue in the face.
And we'll leave judgement on that tactic up to the electorate. Agreed?
Heh, you say that as though you think Harper's not going to have any scandals or going to follow that rule if he's elected.
Ruserious Ruserious:
Heh, you say that as though you think Harper's not going to have any scandals or going to follow that rule if he's elected.
And you say that as though Harper's already elected.
If his government has scandals, I'll be the first one to scream, trust me.
Unlike you, I can see through the partisanship.
I was the first one to cringe when the Ontario Tories held their budget release at a Magna Auto Parts plant.
Delwin @ Fri Jan 13, 2006 1:20 am
Turn's out Zeisman is claiming that Harper did know about the charges:
http://www.liberal.ca/news_e.aspx?id=11378
RUEZ @ Fri Jan 13, 2006 1:31 am
Delwin Delwin:
Oh my god! It's on the Liberal website, it must be true.
Delwin @ Fri Jan 13, 2006 1:50 am
RUEZ RUEZ:
Delwin Delwin:
Oh my god! It's on the Liberal website, it must be true.

All biases aside, he is denying that Harper didn't know.
That Liberal blog on the matter is hilarious!
They are totally euchred now that Harper punted the guy and doing everything they can to keep the story going.
It won't work.
Zeisman is nothing more than than a crook. His day will come.
The Liberals are doing everything they can to give this story legs, but their own war room was so inept this morning that Martin missed the boat when the media asked him about today.
By the time he got a spin on it, it was too late and Harper had punted the guy.
Bye bye Libs!
Delwin Delwin:
RUEZ RUEZ:
Delwin Delwin:
Oh my god! It's on the Liberal website, it must be true.

All biases aside,
he is denying that Harper didn't know.
Martin claims he didn't know about ADSCAM, yet we are expected to believe him.
This is a silly argument. There will be Conservatives MPs who create scandal for their government should the Conservatvies get into power. It's a little naive to think otherwise. And recall in politics, you don't have to do anything wrong to bring your party into disrepute -- you just have to be suspected of doing something wrong.
History amply demonstartes that the Conservatives are no less inclined to scandal than the Liberals, and the reaction of the party in power is the same, regardless of it's the Liberals or the Conservatvies. For that matter, the reaction of the opposition is always the same as well.
The Liberals have, I think, become more blatant at it over the last few years--a corruption, in my opinion, born of the arrogance of assured power. That's why the Liberals will not be getting my vote. They need to stand in the corner a while and think about their sins.
I know for a fact of other wingnut candiadtes out there for the Tories -- train wrecks waiting to happen. Fortunately for Harper, the Zeisman train wreck happened before he was elected (actually he may not have been elected anyway; the people of Trail aren't dumb and they suspected this guy was a bit of flop).
ziggy @ Fri Jan 13, 2006 7:48 pm
Ruserious Ruserious:
ziggy ziggy:
The car wasnt smuggled but the beer was.
Those were 3 deep,Dont most Canadians try and "Sneak" something over the line?

But the Lib's needed's something,anything and I cant believe they dragged this up as a scandal,at least he didnt have envelope's stuffed full of cash.
Bragging about breaking the law are you ziggy?
No,I'll leave that to your liberals.They seem to flaunt the law in the face of honest Canadians all the time.
I was a bad ass in my youth,I wont ever deny it......I broke some laws,well,lot's of laws.

But at least when I got caught I took my punishment like a man,I got a bigger fine for shoplifting some condoms than some big time libs got for handing out envelope's stuffed with taxpayer's cash.
House arrest with a curfew would have been welcomed,maybe the judge could have made me give a few lecture's on the ethic's of stealing condoms and safe sex.
Your Lib's are falling,should I start preparing the huge "Crow" feast for you?
Are the Libs resorting to "Bribes" in your part of Canada too?