The international peace movement, what purpose does it serve
ridenrain @ Fri Jun 01, 2007 8:15 pm
Usefull Idiots :
$1:
LENIN is supposed to have referred to blind defenders and apologists for the Soviet Union in the Western democracies as "useful idiots." Yet even Lenin might have been surprised at how far these useful idiots would carry their partisanship in later years -- including our own times.
http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/sowell090100.asp
sasquatch2 @ Sat Jun 02, 2007 11:42 am
$1:
sandorski
That's ridiculous.
$1:
BartSimpson wrote:
Just not a big fan of leftist weenie peaceniks who ally themselves with the absolute worst causes on the planet.
They sided with Pol Pot, they sided with Ho Chi Minh, they sided with the USSR, they sided with Iraq, they side with Al Qaeda, they side with Hugo Chavez, they pretty much take the side of anyone who is anti-American and anti-freedom.
Just not a big fan of leftist weenie peaceniks who ally themselves with the absolute worst causes on the planet.
They sided with Pol Pot, they sided with Ho Chi Minh, they sided with the USSR, they sided with Iraq, they side with Al Qaeda, they side with Hugo Chavez, they pretty much take the side of anyone who is anti-American and anti-freedom.
That's ridiculous.
Just your opinion but then you believe in CO2 AGW....
Hockey puck.
Durandal @ Mon Jun 11, 2007 8:41 pm
The International Peace Movement, I don't know, but the International Solidarity Movement, I do know ; and its purpose is to help the terrorists.
Here's a post by a guy that infiltrated the ISM for a couple of days -- MUST BE SEEN :
The International Solidarity Movement unmasked
"Peace" activists in Israel supporting Palestinian terrorists posing with their AK 47's...
As for the other the so-called "pacifist" organisations and their usefull idiots, they are simply tools of communism, go to Discover the Networks - A Guide to the Political Left.
When you hear of some "anti-war protes", think about the commie front behind it ; in the US the most active of these is the World Workers Party, known by its sub-organisation ANSWER (Act Now to Stop War and End Racism). Most of the time they don't reveal themselves directly, but sometimes they do...
And I also suggest this movie :
[youtube width=425 height=350]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wflXLGu3T_s[/youtube]
http://enpleindanslmille.blogspot.com/2 ... fiste.html
sandorski @ Mon Jun 11, 2007 10:13 pm
Durandal Durandal:
The International Peace Movement, I don't know, but the International Solidarity Movement, I do know ; and its purpose is to help the terrorists.
Here's a post by a guy that infiltrated the ISM for a couple of days -- MUST BE SEEN :
The International Solidarity Movement unmasked
"Peace" activists in Israel supporting Palestinian terrorists posing with their AK 47's...
As for the other the so-called "pacifist" organisations and their usefull idiots, they are simply tools of communism, go to Discover the Networks - A Guide to the Political Left.
When you hear of some "anti-war protes", think about the commie front behind it ; in the US the most active of these is the World Workers Party, known by its sub-organisation ANSWER (Act Now to Stop War and End Racism). Most of the time they don't reveal themselves directly, but sometimes they do...
And I also suggest this movie :
[youtube width=425 height=350]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wflXLGu3T_s[/youtube]
http://enpleindanslmille.blogspot.com/2 ... fiste.html
Here's a post by a guy that infiltrated the ISM for a couple of days -- MUST BE SEEN :
The International Solidarity Movement unmasked
"Peace" activists in Israel supporting Palestinian terrorists posing with their AK 47's...
As for the other the so-called "pacifist" organisations and their usefull idiots, they are simply tools of communism, go to Discover the Networks - A Guide to the Political Left.
When you hear of some "anti-war protes", think about the commie front behind it ; in the US the most active of these is the World Workers Party, known by its sub-organisation ANSWER (Act Now to Stop War and End Racism). Most of the time they don't reveal themselves directly, but sometimes they do...
And I also suggest this movie :
[youtube width=425 height=350]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wflXLGu3T_s[/youtube]
http://enpleindanslmille.blogspot.com/2 ... fiste.html
Ridiculous. The same method could be used to call any group anywhere all kinds of things.
sasquatch2 @ Tue Jun 12, 2007 7:56 am
Sandorski
$1:
Ridiculous. The same method could be used to call any group anywhere all kinds of things.
Perhaps you could somehow prove this theory.
Scrappy @ Tue Jun 12, 2007 8:00 am
sasquatch2 sasquatch2:
Sandorski
Perhaps you could somehow prove this theory.
$1:
Ridiculous. The same method could be used to call any group anywhere all kinds of things.
Perhaps you could somehow prove this theory.
That would be nice Sandorski and could you type more than five or six words. A paragraph would be so refreshing.
sasquatch2 @ Tue Jun 12, 2007 11:40 am
These international nihlist, anarchist types have been about since the late 19th century. They were very active in the Russian revolution and had to flee Russia after the Bolsheviks consolidated power....the Reds knew they were trouble....the activist refuggees from Russia then infected post-war Germany and they then had to flee Nazi Germany which was really a reaction to their influence.
Widely scattered they served as "useful idiots" for the Soviets from the 30's on....the fall of the Berlin Wall forced then to gravitate to the ME......these were the BADER MEINHOF/RED BRIGADES of Europe.....the characters shown in the article are the remnants of that crazy culture.
Any cause they support, that succeeds, invariably liquidates them after success.
Proffessional revolutionaries they have only one purpose or goal.....revolution.
"The revolution consumes it's children."
BartSimpson @ Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:48 pm
ShepherdsDog ShepherdsDog:
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
Just not a big fan of leftist weenie peaceniks who ally themselves with the absolute worst causes on the planet.
They sided with Pol Pot, they sided with Ho Chi Minh, they sided with the USSR, they sided with Iraq, they side with Al Qaeda, they side with Hugo Chavez, they pretty much take the side of anyone who is anti-American and anti-freedom.
They sided with Pol Pot, they sided with Ho Chi Minh, they sided with the USSR, they sided with Iraq, they side with Al Qaeda, they side with Hugo Chavez, they pretty much take the side of anyone who is anti-American and anti-freedom.
Are you talking about the UN Bart?
It seems that way, doesn't it?
BartSimpson @ Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:51 pm
sandorski sandorski:
Ridiculous.
Just curious, do you know any other words?
sandorski @ Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:51 pm
BartSimpson @ Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:53 pm
sandorski sandorski:
OMG Christians are Nazis!!
OMFG, you're a retard!
Durandal @ Tue Jun 12, 2007 1:21 pm
sandorski sandorski:
OMG Christians are Nazis!!
Patrick_Ross tried the same thing with me on an other tread and it didn't work out well for him.
What about Hitler, wasn't he a Christian ?
Pie XII et les Juifs
Le silence de Pie XII
Not only does this equation of christian = nazi does not hold the line, but it is a... wait... ridiculous comparasion with the commie/"anti-war" mouvement hence the size and impact of the second.
Perhaps sandorski could explain why about 1 person in 10 wears a Che t-shirt in so-called "pro-peace" marches.
BartSimpson @ Tue Jun 12, 2007 2:40 pm
Durandal Durandal:
Perhaps sandorski could explain why about 1 person in 10 wears a Che t-shirt in so-called "pro-peace" marches.
Nice point. Très bien fait.
sandorski @ Tue Jun 12, 2007 2:59 pm
Durandal Durandal:
sandorski sandorski:
OMG Christians are Nazis!!
Patrick_Ross tried the same thing with me on an other tread and it didn't work out well for him.
What about Hitler, wasn't he a Christian ?
Pie XII et les Juifs
Le silence de Pie XII
Not only does this equation of christian = nazi does not hold the line, but it is a... wait... ridiculous comparasion with the commie/"anti-war" mouvement hence the size and impact of the second.
Perhaps sandorski could explain why about 1 person in 10 wears a Che t-shirt in so-called "pro-peace" marches.
That's my point exactly.
BartSimpson @ Tue Jun 12, 2007 3:09 pm
sandorski sandorski:
Durandal Durandal:
Perhaps sandorski could explain why about 1 person in 10 wears a Che t-shirt in so-called "pro-peace" marches.
That's my point exactly.
Just answer the question, please. We already have IceOwl for incomprehensible and obfuscated logic. He'll pout if you steal his style.
