Would Canada make a Logical Target
ziggy @ Fri Jul 08, 2005 10:27 pm
ShepherdsDog ShepherdsDog:
why is that when someone can't refute another poster's arguement they automatically turn to personal insults? Real mature

I even asked for some "salient" points but just got insulted instead.
Oh well,such is a debate with derby.
DerbyX @ Fri Jul 08, 2005 10:28 pm
$1:
anti-everything eh dickwad, how about anti-DerbyX
whackjob, (snifffff), "you stink!"
ziggy @ Fri Jul 08, 2005 10:30 pm
DerbyX DerbyX:
$1:
anti-everything eh dickwad, how about anti-DerbyX
whackjob, (snifffff), "you stink!"
![Canada Flag [flag]](./images/smilies/smilie_flag.gif)
EDIT-derby....come back when you have some years under your belt and can debate in a more mature fashion,I hate argueing with kid's that seem to think they know what the worlds about when all they have is what they were taught in school which as we all know give's you no life experience,just book smart.
DerbyX @ Fri Jul 08, 2005 10:57 pm
$1:
EDIT-derby....come back when you have some years under your belt and can debate in a more mature fashion,I hate argueing with kid's that seem to think they know what the worlds about when all they have is what they were taught in school which as we all know give's you no life experience,just book smart. Wink
Then debate the CIA-Saddam links. I'm willing to bet that my life experience is equal to yours. I'm willing to bet that my "book smarts" beat anything you can offer. Witness our AB-hay-help debate. You just couldn't admit that ON did indeed send loads of help and Ab did indeed need it. You disputed the links proving it and disputed other Albertans who verified it, not because it wasn't true but
because you couldn't admit that Alberta needed help and Ontario did its best to help.. Pick a debate and try me. I'll reframe from any flame bullshit. I'll even admit if I don't have personal knowledge about the subject. Do you have any substance or will you just post anti-Liberal literature. I at least post sensible critiques about the conservative stances and specifics as to why I will or will not vote for them other then some people who scream nonstop about how the Liberals are all crooks and responsible for every problem Canada has had since Federation.
Shall we debate politics? Shall we debate theology? Shall we debate the merits of old BSG Vs new BSG? I am prepared.
Here are some interesting readings related to CIA involvement in Iraq and the Ba'ath Party.
http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/51/217.html
DerbyX DerbyX:
Then debate the CIA-Saddam links. I'm willing to bet that my life experience is equal to yours. I'm willing to bet that my "book smarts" beat anything you can offer. Witness our AB-hay-help debate. You just couldn't admit that ON did indeed send loads of help and Ab did indeed need it. You disputed the links proving it and disputed other Albertans who verified it, not because it wasn't true but
because you couldn't admit that Alberta needed help and Ontario did its best to help.. Pick a debate and try me. I'll reframe from any flame bullshit. I'll even admit if I don't have personal knowledge about the subject. Do you have any substance or will you just post anti-Liberal literature. I at least post sensible critiques about the conservative stances and specifics as to why I will or will not vote for them other then some people who scream nonstop about how the Liberals are all crooks and responsible for every problem Canada has had since Federation.
Shall we debate politics? Shall we debate theology? Shall we debate the merits of old BSG Vs new BSG? I am prepared.

Are you prepared to acknowledge that 'reframe' is not a word?
Tman1 @ Fri Jul 08, 2005 11:18 pm
blue_nose blue_nose:
DerbyX DerbyX:
Then debate the CIA-Saddam links. I'm willing to bet that my life experience is equal to yours. I'm willing to bet that my "book smarts" beat anything you can offer. Witness our AB-hay-help debate. You just couldn't admit that ON did indeed send loads of help and Ab did indeed need it. You disputed the links proving it and disputed other Albertans who verified it, not because it wasn't true but
because you couldn't admit that Alberta needed help and Ontario did its best to help.. Pick a debate and try me. I'll reframe from any flame bullshit. I'll even admit if I don't have personal knowledge about the subject. Do you have any substance or will you just post anti-Liberal literature. I at least post sensible critiques about the conservative stances and specifics as to why I will or will not vote for them other then some people who scream nonstop about how the Liberals are all crooks and responsible for every problem Canada has had since Federation.
Shall we debate politics? Shall we debate theology? Shall we debate the merits of old BSG Vs new BSG? I am prepared.

Are you prepared to acknowledge that 'reframe' is not a word?

I think he meant refrain.

and actually reframe is a word.
DerbyX @ Fri Jul 08, 2005 11:18 pm
$1:
Very salient, thank-you.
$1:
Are you prepared to aknowledge that 'reframe' is not a word?
Absolutely. Refraim is the correct spelling )I think)
Aknowledge is Acknowledge if I remember correctly.
Tman1 Tman1:
I think he meant refrain.

I know... I'm just feeling agitating tonight
Tman1 @ Fri Jul 08, 2005 11:20 pm
Nope refraim is not a word. Reframe is although I don't think you mean that word in context of what you said.
DerbyX @ Fri Jul 08, 2005 11:25 pm
$1:
4 entries found for refrain.
re·frain1 Audio pronunciation of "refrain" ( P ) Pronunciation Key (r-frn)
v. re·frained, re·frain·ing, re·frains
v. intr.
To hold oneself back; forbear: refrained from swearing.
v. tr. Archaic
To restrain or hold back; curb.
[Middle English refreinen, from Old French refrener, to restrain, from Latin refrnre : re-, re- + frnre, to restrain (from frnum, bridle, from frendere, to grind. See ghrendh- in Indo-European Roots).]re·frainer n.
I stand corrected. I always thought it was "refraiim". Live & learn! Thanks!
Tman1 Tman1:
Nope refraim is not a word. Reframe is although I don't think you mean that word in context of what you mean.
reframe isn't in my bookshelf (albeit, very old) dictionary... I assume it means 're-frame', as in, "Joe did a shitty job framing that window, and I had to reframe it."
Tman1 @ Fri Jul 08, 2005 11:31 pm
blue_nose blue_nose:
Tman1 Tman1:
Nope refraim is not a word. Reframe is although I don't think you mean that word in context of what you mean.
reframe isn't in my bookshelf (albeit, very old) dictionary... I assume it means 're-frame', as in, "Joe did a shitty job framing that window, and I had to reframe it."
Ha ha you need a new dictionary but your right.
reframe
\Re*frame"\ (r?*fr?m), v. t. To frame again or anew.
DerbyX @ Fri Jul 08, 2005 11:32 pm
$1:
1 entry found for reframe.
reframe
\Re*frame"\ (r?*fr?m), v. t. To frame again or anew.
Correct Blue_Nose
canucker canucker:
-Mario- -Mario-:
Interesting (scary) fact. Of the 6 nations on Bin Ladens list we are the only one's that haven't been hit yet.

They have to find us first.... If by any chance some of them have taken classes other than religious fanatical doctrine perhaps they would look for us in the most likely place ( same place many U.S. school kids find us) the middle of europe right next to Switzerland...